How much did Mario and Alma Pastega Family Foundation grant in FY2025?

Health$2.5MHuman Services$1.6MEducation$948kFood & Nutrition$247kReligion$220kArts & Culture$188kYouth Development$165kRecreation & Sports$115kOther$0

02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k57 grants · $185k
$10k–50k13 grants · $179k
$50k–250k2 grants · $139k
$250k+2 grants · $897k

$4,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
TILLAMOOK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA	$647,000
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION	$250,000
PORTLAND ART MUSEUM	$75,000
OSU FOUNDATION	$64,000
CORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION	$29,500
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES	$25,000
Individual grant recipient	$15,000
TILLAMOOK BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE	$15,000
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION	$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME	$12,000
TRI PARISH FOOD BANK	$10,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION	$10,000
Individual grant recipient	$10,000
HOLY FAMILY PARISH KIRKLAND	$10,000
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION	$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.8M · 92 repeat orgs$514k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

92 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.8M

$407k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

+24%

Still filing today

63%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GS
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION CORVALLIS
6× · 2020–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +54% · 29% of their budget
TC
TILLAMOOK COUNTY FAMILY YMCA
6× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +23%
Oregon State University Foundation
6× · 2020–2025 · $345k · revenue +33%

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2024 · $263k
TR
TILLAMOOK REVITALIZATION ASSOCIATION INC
one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -86%
BC
BENTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research

Environment

Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science

Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment

Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy

Cascades Academy of Central Oregon

Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.

Education

Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment

Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—

University of Western States

The mission of the University of Western States is to advance the science and art of integrated health care through excellence in education and patient care.

Health

The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified

Oregon Social Learning Center Inc

The oregon social learning center is a collaborative, multidisciplinary center dedicated to increasing the scientific understanding of social and psychological processes related to healthy development and family functioning. oslc applies…

Education

Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—

Lane County Community Foundation

The mission of Lane County Community Foundation (the Foundation) is to improve the quality of life in Lane County, Kansas and communities within Lane County, and to ensure that the communities in and around Lane County will forever remain…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corvallis Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Montessori School of Ojai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/94

the rest of the field

13%

7,819/58,185

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

83/85

Grantees still filing

65/85

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$2,422,500Other$1,776,538Human Services$1,159,500Education$497,500Philanthropy$189,296Arts & Culture$171,000Youth Development$146,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR50.5× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Benton Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Ralph Hull Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis · United Way of Linn Benton and Lincoln Counties · Chambers Family Foundation · Juan Young Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mario and Alma Pastega Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

20get no government money at all

14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home