Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank Pernell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$173kHealth$89kCrime & Legal$89kEducation$40kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$12kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$755k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE ACRE FUND$7,000
SUDU INC$6,000
HORIZONS AT COLORADO ACADEMY$6,000
ROSE ANDOM CENTER$5,000
A CHILDS NOTEBOOK$5,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$5,000
COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$3,000
SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$3,000
MATTHEWS HOUSE$3,000
GLOBAL CONNECTIONS$3,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN VICTIM LAW CENTER$3,000
THE CONFLICT CENTER$2,000
GOLDEN CRESCENT CASA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS NAVAJO RELIEF FUND: $2k → 14%NAVAJO STRONG: $5k → 8%THE VILLAGE INSTITUTE: $1k → 8%MATTHEWS HOUSE: $3k → 11%NAVAJO STRONG: $1k → 8%MATTHEWS HOUSE: $2k → 11%NAVAJO STRONG: $1k → 8%NAVAJO STRONG: $1k → 8%THRIVING FAMILIES: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Frank Pernell Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Frank Pernell Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$406k · 24 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$406k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesCrime & LegalScience & TechFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    ROSE ANDOM CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +117%
  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +258%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • C
    COVA
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • EH
    Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
2
Global Strategies

Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.

Health
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
5
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
6
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
7
Adara Development (Usa)

Our mission is to bridge the world of business and the world of people in extreme poverty, and to support vulnerable communities with health, education and other essential services

International
8
Mothers Without Borders

Mothers Without Borders is dedicated to fostering resilience and self-sufficiency in developing countries through a holistic approach to community empowerment, particularly focusing on the most vulnerable women, youth, and children. Our…

Health
9
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
10
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
11
Project Milk Mission

Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Amani Global Works

Amani Global Works ("Amani") was formed to develop and implement a comprehensive, inclusive and sustainable model for the provision of healthcare and related services to underserved rural communities in Africa. Amanis mission is to save…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mother House Dba Haven Ridge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $39,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFI…BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDAT…SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $20,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USAPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $11,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION…VISION TO LEARN: $8,000 · HealthVISION TO LEARN+1 more: $1,000 · HealthONE ACRE FUND: $42,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $23,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES …MICROFINANCING PARTNERS IN AFRICA: $16,000 · InternationalMICROFINANCING PARTNERS I…GLOBAL CONNECTIONS: $11,000 · InternationalGLOBAL CONNECTIONSSudu Inc: $6,000 · InternationalSudu IncHORIZONS AT COLORADO ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherHORIZONS AT COLORADO ACADE…Individual grant recipient: $19,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAFRICARE: $12,000 · OtherAFRICARETHE GRETTA FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherTHE GRETTA FOUNDATIONROCKY MTN VICTIMS LAW CENTER: $7,000 · OtherROCKY MTN VICTIMS LAW CENT…HEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · OtherGOLDEN CRESCENT CASA: $4,000 · Other+7 more: $14,000 · Other+7 moreROSE ANDOM CENTER INC: $45,000 · Crime & LegalROSE ANDOM CENTER IN…THE CONFLICT CENTER: $18,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CONFLICT CENTERCOLORADO LEGAL SERVICES: $13,000 · Crime & LegalCOLORADO LEGAL SERVI…ROCKY MOUNTAIN VICTIM LAW CENTER: $3,000 · Crime & LegalNavajoStrong: $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHRIVING FAMILIES: $2,000 · Human ServicesPartnership With Native Americans: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE INSTITUTE: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $12,000 · Food & NutritionA Childs Notebook: $10,000 · Youth Development
Health$114,000International$98,000Other$102,000Crime & Legal$79,000Human Services$18,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROSE ANDOM CENTER INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $42,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $39,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $23,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONFLICT CENTER: $18,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMICROFINANCING PARTNERS IN AFRICA: $16,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO LEGAL SERVICES: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICARE: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRETTA FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetGLOBAL CONNECTIONS: $11,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA Childs Notebook: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNavajoStrong: $8,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSudu Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN VICTIM LAW CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEqualize Health Formerly D-Rev: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAR AWAY FRIENDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHRIVING FAMILIES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPartnership With Native Americans: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TALES RANCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VILLAGE INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROSE ANDOM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds THE CONFLICT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MICROFINANCING PARTNERS IN AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AFRICARE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE GRETTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds A Childs Notebook ↗
  • Who funds NavajoStrong ↗
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds Sudu Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MATTHEWS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN VICTIM LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Equalize Health Formerly D-Rev ↗
  • Who funds FAR AWAY FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVING FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Partnership With Native Americans ↗
  • Who funds TALL TALES RANCH ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER HOUSE DBA HAVEN RIDGE ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Kettering Family Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank Pernell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank Pernell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Frank Pernell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Frank Pernell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank Pernell’s filings →

More from the funding graph