Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Frank Deaton & McBride Alexander Deaton Christian Memorial Foundatio

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$134kReligion$30kHousing & Shelter$7kHuman Services$6kInternational$5kEnvironment$2kPhilanthropy$1kEducation$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$859k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JOE MARTIN ALS FOUNDATION$20,441
ALS ASSOCIATION$5,000
FEEL THE VIBE$5,000
RAIN INC WORLD AIDS DAY$2,080
SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES$516
GOOD FELLOWS CLUB$136
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES: $4k → 10%SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES: $2k → 10%SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMUNITIES: $516 → 10%RAIN INC: $100 → 10%FEEL THE VIBE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$177k · 10 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$177k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+74%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    The Joe Martin ALS Foundation
    7× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +58%
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue +95%
  • SH
    Supportive Housing Communities Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GOOD FELLOWS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • MP
    MYERS PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SH
    SUPPORTIVE HOUSING COMMISSIONMCCRE
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc

Helping homeless men by providing a safe shelter and meeting their basic needs as well as address barriers related to homelessness and self-sufficiency and helping homeless men to obtain and maintain more appropriate housing.

2
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
3
The Shepherds Center of Charlotte

The Shepherds Center of Charlotte enriches the lives of older adults by providing a network of support to increase social connection, expand access to critical resources, and combat the negative effects of isolation.

4
Als United North Carolina

To discover treatments and a cure for als and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.

Health
5
Sustain Charlotte Inc

Sustain Charlotte's mission is to create a more equitable, connected, and healthy community by inspiring responsible growth and transportation choices.

Community Improvement
6
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
7
InReach

Dedicated to providing high quality residential and community services to individuals with developmental and other disabilities in Mecklenburg and surrounding counties.

Human Services
8
The Arc of North Carolina Inc

The Arc of North Carolina is committed to securing for all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities the opportunity to choose and realize their goals of where and how they learn, live, work, and play.

Human Services
9
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House provides a place where homeless inividuals can stay to recover from surgery or other illnesses. All homless individuals are referred to Samaritan house from any one of the Charlotte area hospitals.

Housing & Shelter
10
Compassionate Care Als Inc

Assistance to individuals and families with ALS

Human Services
11
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

12
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associatio Evergreen Chapter

Leading the fight to treat and cure ALS through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with Lou Gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Supportive Housing Communities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feel the Vibe Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Joe Martin ALS Foundation — $83,567 · HealthThe Joe Martin ALS FoundationAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $36,600 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN+1 more — $226 · HealthMYERS PARK BAPTIST CHURCH — $28,000 · OtherMYERS PARK BAPTIST CHURCHALS ASSOCIATION — $14,000 · OtherALS ASSOCIATIONRAIN INC WORLD AIDS DAY — $5,160 · OtherRAIN INC WORLD AIDS DAYCENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE CHANGE — $2,400 · Other+6 more — $5,000 · Other+6 moreSupportive Housing Communities Inc — $6,066 · Human ServicesFeel the Vibe Inc — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesSugar Creek Charter School Inc — $500 · EducationTHE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC — $236 · Recreation & SportsSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $100 · Food & Nutrition
Health$120,393Other$54,560Human Services$11,166Education$500Recreation & Sports$236Food & Nutrition$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Joe Martin ALS Foundation — $83,567 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $36,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSupportive Housing Communities Inc — $6,066 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSugar Creek Charter School Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC — $236 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $226 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAIN Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Joe Martin ALS Foundation
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
  • Who funds Supportive Housing Communities Inc
  • Who funds Feel the Vibe Inc
  • Who funds Sugar Creek Charter School Inc
  • Who funds THE GOOD FELLOWS CLUB INC
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc
  • Who funds RAIN Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Frank Deaton & McBride Alexander Deaton Christian Memorial Foundatio funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Frank Deaton & McBride Alexander Deaton Christian Memorial Foundatio?

    Find your warmest path to Frank Deaton & McBride Alexander Deaton Christian Memorial Foundatio through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph