How much did Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc grant in FY2024?

Human Services$6.8MPhilanthropy$3.4MEducation$3.4MHealth$1.7MCivil Rights$710kCommunity Improvement$567kArts & Culture$477kCrime & Legal$338kHousing & Shelter$232kOther$8.2M

02FY2024 · 89 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k54 grants · $306k
$10k–50k15 grants · $335k
$50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
$250k+1 grant · $317k

$9,000

Median grant

States reached

$174M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Pinellas County Urban League Inc	$316,667
Individual grant recipient	$155,550
Golden Generations Inc	$118,750
Hope Villages of America	$118,750
Healthy Start Coalition of Pinellas Inc	$118,750
Braiding with a Twist Salon Inc	$115,442
Speakeasy Media Foundation	$106,688
Community EFX Inc	$106,563
Pinellas Community Foundation	$100,000
City of St Petersburg	$100,000
Starting Right Now	$98,097
City of St Petersburg	$95,000
The Shirley Proctor Puller Foundation Inc	$93,630
SailFuture	$79,168
Metropolitan Ministries Inc	$79,168

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$21M · 102 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

102 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 74 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

102

Total granted

$21M

$831k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+20%

Still filing today

75%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PC
Pinellas County Urban League Inc
8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +56%
PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +5%
EH
EMPATH HEALTH INC
4× · 2018–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +55%

Funded once

HENRY J KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $143k · revenue -62%
YR
YOUR REAL STORIES INC
one grant, 2023 · $95k · revenue -50%
TC
The Children's Home Inc dba Children's Home Network
one grant, 2017 · $80k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tampabay-Job-Links Inc

—

Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness

Lead agency in the community for providers of homeless/prevention services in manatee/sarasota. responsible to plan strategies with community partners, assist with grants, educate the public, advocate with local leadership, administer the…

Human Services

Step Up Suncoast Inc

Step Up Suncoast empowers individuals and families to achieve long-term economic stability through education, support services, and community partnerships. The Agency's activities include combating poverty through community action programs…

Community Improvement

Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—

Family Promise of Southeast Florida Inc

The Organization's mission is to empower families in making their transition from homelessness to sustainable independence.

Religion

Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—

Tampa Bay Academy of Hope Inc

TBAH provides prevention and intervention programming to at risk youth individuals and families. Services include case management mentoring tutoring job readiness job placement educational and vocational services leadership training GED…

Employment

Hps Helping People Succeed Inc

To empower individuals of all ages and abilities and their families through comprehensive intervention and disability services promoting growth and belonging.

Health

Florida Prosperity Partnership Inc

The annual financial capability training conference brings together leaders and practitioners of all levels representing non-profit organizations large and small, financial institutions, academic circles, for-profit organizations and…

—

Gulf Coast Partnership Inc

Gulf coast partnership, inc. (the organization) mission is to prevent homelessness in charlotte county. the organization is a department of hud lead agency on homelessness in the state of florida. the organization is funded through a…

Housing & Shelter

Peer Support Coalition of Florida Inc

The peer support coalition of florida's mission is to advance peer support in florida and nationally. we provide access to resources that will encourage peers (individuals with lived experience of mental health and/or substance use issues)…

Education

Parc Inc

Parc center for disabilities is the premier provider of life-changing services to children and adults with developmental disabilities in the tampa bay area. (continued on schedule o)we structure our services around three centers of…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keshawns Korner. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%3/161

the rest of the field

17%

2,023/11,623

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

133 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 133 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

125/133

Grantees still filing

83/133

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$9,168,015Human Services$6,733,086Philanthropy$3,407,030Education$3,371,282Health$1,713,408Civil Rights$709,884Community Improvement$566,879

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinellas Community FoundationFL171.6× affinity87 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinellas Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · White Family Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation · Top Jewish Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

37get no government money at all

45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

2rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines