Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Foundation for Opioid Response Efforts

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
104
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$396k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Health$21MEducation$8.3MCrime & Legal$2.7MSocial Science$1.6MYouth Development$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.2MScience & Tech$1.1MArts & Culture$757kOther$0
02FY2025 · 104 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k45 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k58 grants · $7.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $396k
$60,000
Median grant
33
States reached
$93M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS$396,496
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$225,000
MORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC$225,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS$225,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$225,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS$225,000
MORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC$225,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER$225,000
THE DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION$223,410
THE DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION$223,410
NATIONAL INDIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC$221,430
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$198,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$198,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$197,130
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$197,130
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $556k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $34k → 11%AVIVO: $68k → 11%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $45k → 12%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $34k → 11%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $5k → 12%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $68k → 19%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $34k → 11%AVIVO: $34k → 11%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $34k → 19%MAGGIE'S PLACE: $34k → 11%AMISTADES INC: $68k → 15%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $34k → 19%AMISTADES INC: $34k → 15%AMISTADES INC: $34k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$37M · 92 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

92 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
10

Total granted

$37M
$542k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+13%

Still filing today

66%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +55%
  • MC
    MORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +73%
  • EM
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $135k · revenue +29%
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2021 · $56k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
4
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
9
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
11
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
12
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is My Fathers House Nashville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Addiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Immigrant Worker SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/87
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,478

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/76
Grantees still filing
54/76
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT — $1,439,100 · OtherCENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENTUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO — $1,350,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICODENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $1,340,460 · OtherDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA — $1,182,780 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $675,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS — $675,000 · OtherSESAME WORKSHOP — $756,900 · Other+58 more — $12,703,492 · Other+58 moreEMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $1,345,086 · HealthEMERGENCY MEDICINE FO…Public Health Institute — $1,139,643 · HealthPublic Health Institu…FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $622,376 · HealthFRIENDS RESEARCH INST…Foundation for Healthy Communities — $568,283 · HealthFoundation for Health…HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $466,437 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYS…HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION — $431,804 · HealthHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVE…THE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE — $311,632 · Health+21 more — $2,529,353 · Health+21 moreMOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $647,909 · EducationMOUNTAIN ARE…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $600,000 · EducationTemple Unive…University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Foundation — $591,485 · EducationUniversity o…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $540,676 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFE…University of Kentucky Research Foundation — $446,520 · EducationUniversity o…Trustees of Tufts College — $427,960 · EducationTrustees of …THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $405,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $197,064 · Education+7 more — $606,366 · Education+7 moreMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,350,000 · Crime & LegalMORGAN CO…LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC — $1,000,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID…EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $664,467 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUS…LEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $452,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL ACT…The Rand Corporation — $1,006,050 · Public BenefitBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC — $467,335 · Public BenefitASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS — $74,912 · Public BenefitNATIONAL INDIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC — $1,328,580 · Youth DevelopmentHOUSING WORKS INC — $600,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY — $564,319 · Community ImprovementOPPORTUNITY LABS FOUNDATION INC — $70,251 · Community Improvement
Other$20,122,732Health$7,414,614Education$4,462,980Crime & Legal$3,466,467Public Benefit$1,548,297Youth Development$1,328,580Community Improvement$1,234,570

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT — $1,439,100 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,350,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetEMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION — $1,345,086 over 6y, 21% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $1,340,460 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL INDIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC — $1,328,580 over 4y, 18% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $1,139,643 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $1,006,050 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC — $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP — $756,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $664,467 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $647,909 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $622,376 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC — $600,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $600,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth Foundation — $591,485 over 4y, 12% of budgetCABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC — $581,564 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $571,183 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Healthy Communities — $568,283 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $564,319 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $540,676 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC — $467,335 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $466,437 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $452,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $446,520 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION — $431,804 over 3y, 24% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $427,960 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $405,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy Schools Campaign — $334,617 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE — $311,632 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAGENCY FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION INC — $274,470 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $229,230 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS — $225,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $197,064 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADDICTION POLICY FORUM — $175,283 over 2y, 12% of budgetHoller Harm Reduction — $153,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY INC — $146,250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute — $145,522 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMISTADES INC — $135,478 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetBaltimore Safe Haven Corp — $135,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetJUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTH — $135,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN TOP CARES COALITION INC — $135,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetMY FATHERS HOUSE NASHVILLE — $135,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetAddiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire — $135,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR COUNSELING & CONSULTATION — $135,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $135,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSIMPLY HOPE FAMILY OUTREACH INC — $135,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCOWETA FORCE INC — $134,996 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetTHE MARTINSBURG INITIATIVE INC — $134,956 over 3y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INDIAN YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Healthy Communities ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL ACTION CENTER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cencora Impact Founda…Laura and John Arnold…California Healthcare…American Cancer Socie…Conrad N Hilton Found…The Robert Wood Johns…Direct ReliefThe Chicago Community…The Ayco Charitable F…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…
Cencora Impact FoundationPA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cencora Impact Foundation · Laura and John Arnold Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Direct Relief · The Chicago Community Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Opioid Response Efforts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Friends Research Institute Inc — 63% of income from government
  • Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — 28% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Services of Atlantic County Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • The Addiction Policy Forum — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for Opioid Response Efforts?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for Opioid Response Efforts through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines