Skip to content
Fore Foundation for Art Science And at a glance

· Private foundation

Fore Foundation for Art Science And

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$374kHealth$255kHousing & Shelter$255kEducation$164kArts & Culture$108kHuman Services$55kAnimals$48kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC$25,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$10,000
NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY$10,000
BARD COLLEGE$5,000
MAX PLANCK FLORIDA CORPORATION$5,000
BLUE PATH SERVICE DOGS$5,000
HELP USA$500
BOYS TOWN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $30k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $26k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $25k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $25k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $23k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $15k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 14 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$1.0M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+155%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $180k · revenue +29%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +241%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $154k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • PH
    PHOENIX HOUSE (NATIONAL CAPITOL TRTMT REC)
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CM
    CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • GG
    GJON GJEKA FAMILY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc; the most unlike its peers is Art and Remembrance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $245,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION …+1 more: $7,500 · PhilanthropyPHOENIX HOUSE OF MID-ATLANTIC: $110,000 · OtherPHOENIX HOUSE OF MID-ATLANTICFISCHER HOUSE: $75,000 · OtherFISCHER HOUSEPHOENIX HOUSE (NATIONAL CAPITOL TRTMT REC): $20,000 · OtherPHOENIX HOUSE (NATIONAL CAPIT…SETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $13,813 · OtherCHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE: $12,000 · OtherBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $30,500 · OtherBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INCBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC: $22,500 · OtherBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE IN…EVA'S VILLAGE INC: $45,000 · OtherEVA'S VILLAGE INC+5 more: $25,600 · Other+5 moreTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SUNDARI FOU…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $90,000 · HealthCANCER RESEAR…Max Planck Florida Corporation: $45,000 · HealthMax Planck Fl…NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY: $30,000 · HealthNATIONAL CAPI…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBARD COLLEGE: $155,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEUNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM: $153,705 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY O…YOUNG AUDIENCES INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureArt and Remembrance Inc: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$252,500Other$354,413Housing & Shelter$180,000Health$166,000Education$155,000Human Services$153,705Arts & Culture$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $245,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM: $153,705 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMax Planck Florida Corporation: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $30,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC: $22,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $13,813 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArt and Remembrance Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetARDSLEY SECOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis D Srybnik Found…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Louis D Srybnik FoundationNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis D Srybnik Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fore Foundation for Art Science And funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fore Foundation for Art Science And. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Max Planck Florida Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • The Sundari Foundation Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fore Foundation for Art Science And?

Find your warmest path to Fore Foundation for Art Science And through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fore Foundation for Art Science And’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home