Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fore Foundation for Art Science And

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$205k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Philanthropy$374kHealth$255kHousing & Shelter$255kEducation$164kArts & Culture$108kHuman Services$55kAnimals$48kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI FOUNDATION$80,000
SUNDARI FOUNDATION$60,000
FISCHER HOUSE$25,000
UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC$15,000
NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY$10,000
BLUE PATH SERVICE DOGS$5,000
BARD COLLEGE$5,000
MAX PLANCK FLORIDA CORPORATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $30k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $26k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $25k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $23k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $15k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$971k · 14 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$971k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+75%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $180k · revenue +29%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +241%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $129k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • PH
    PHOENIX HOUSE (NATIONAL CAPITOL TRTMT REC)
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CM
    CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • AR
    ART & REMEMBERANCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc and the most unlike its peers is Art and Remembrance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $245,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION I…+1 more — $7,500 · PhilanthropyPHOENIX HOUSE OF MID-ATLANTIC — $110,000 · OtherPHOENIX HOUSE OF MID-ATLANTICFISCHER HOUSE — $75,000 · OtherFISCHER HOUSEPHOENIX HOUSE (NATIONAL CAPITOL TRTMT REC) — $20,000 · OtherPHOENIX HOUSE (NATIONAL CAPITO…SETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $13,813 · OtherCHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE — $12,000 · OtherBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC — $25,500 · OtherBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INCBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC — $22,500 · OtherBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INCEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $45,000 · OtherEVA'S VILLAGE INC+3 more — $25,000 · Other+3 moreTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SUNDARI FOU…BARD COLLEGE — $150,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGECANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $80,000 · HealthCANCER RESEA…Max Planck Florida Corporation — $40,000 · HealthMax Planck F…NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY — $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL CAP…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM — $128,705 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY …YOUNG AUDIENCES INC — $65,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureArt and Remembrance Inc — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$252,500Other$348,813Housing & Shelter$180,000Education$150,000Health$141,000Human Services$128,705Arts & Culture$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $245,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SUNDARI FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM — $128,705 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES INC — $65,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMax Planck Florida Corporation — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC — $25,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC — $22,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $13,813 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArt and Remembrance Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetARDSLEY SECOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Louis D Srybnik Found…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Louis D Srybnik FoundationNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Louis D Srybnik Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fore Foundation for Art Science And funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Max Planck Florida Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
  • The Sundari Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fore Foundation for Art Science And?

Find your warmest path to Fore Foundation for Art Science And through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines