Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Louis D Srybnik Foundation

A non-profit organization that contributes funds and provides support through direct annual grants and also works with and provides services to 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations to increase public awareness, funding, support and (continued on schedule o)(continued from page 2) implementation for a) programs that enable young people…

$176k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$210kHealth$170kEducation$168kHuman Services$156kArts & Culture$75kAnimals$65kHousing & Shelter$50kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$105,000
BARD COLLEGE$10,000
UNITED WAY$10,000
NATIONAL CAPITAL TRTMT & REC (PHOENIX HOUSE)$10,000
BERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC$10,000
EVA'S VILLAGE$10,000
MAX PLANCK FLORIDA CORPORATION$10,000
YOUNG AUDIENCES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $51k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $45k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $20k → 9%UNITED WAY: $18k → 9%UNITED WAY: $15k → 9%UNITED WAY: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$578k · 7 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$578k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+44%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM
    6× · 2019–2024 · $159k · revenue +33%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +87%
  • MP
    Max Planck Florida Corporation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of Palm Beach County Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue -20%
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Broward County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bergen County Horse Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $105,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY MIAMI INCUnited Way of Palm Beach County Inc — $105,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Palm Beach County IncUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $105,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INCNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY — $95,000 · HealthNATIONAL CAPITAL TREA…Max Planck Florida Corporation — $75,000 · HealthMax Planck Florida Co…UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM — $158,705 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF WESTC…YOUNG AUDIENCES INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG AUD…BERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC — $64,500 · AnimalsBARD COLLEGE — $60,000 · EducationEVA'S VILLAGE — $50,000 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Other
Philanthropy$315,000Health$170,000Human Services$158,705Arts & Culture$75,000Animals$64,500Education$60,000Other$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM — $158,705 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $105,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of Palm Beach County Inc — $105,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $105,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL TREATMENT AND RECOVERY — $95,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMax Planck Florida Corporation — $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES INC — $75,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC — $64,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fore Foundation for Art Science AndNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fore Foundation for Art Science And · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Louis D Srybnik Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • United Way of Broward County Inc38% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc15% of income from government
  • United Way of Palm Beach County Inc1% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Louis D Srybnik Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Louis D Srybnik Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph