Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Follow Your Dream Foundation Inc

To create better futures for disadvantaged people

$21M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$4.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.

International$16MPhilanthropy$7.5MCommunity Improvement$5.8MEducation$2.9MEmployment$2.5MScience & Tech$1.7MHealth$850kYouth Development$407kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 36 grants below total $18,961,097 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $20,931,602 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,970,505 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+17 grants · $17M
$198,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UBS Financial Services Inc$4,400,000
Jewish Communal Fund$2,200,000
The Clear Fund DBA GiveWell$2,000,000
Founders Pledge Inc$2,000,000
MIT$1,152,452
Center for Innovative Governa$750,000
One Acre Fund$750,000
Appleseed Inc$750,000
Friends of Raising the Villag$500,000
Digital Divide Data$500,000
Emma Torch$500,000
Ariadne Labs$500,000
Maisha Meds Inc$300,000
Johns Hopkins University$255,250
Climate Action for SMA$250,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $520k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WelcomeNST: $10k → 11%Emma Torch: $500k → 20%Marlene Meyerson JCC Manhatta: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 11 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
25

Total granted

$15M
$6.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +23%
  • ARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +106% · 28% of their budget
  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • E
    Educate
    one grant, 2023 · $2.4M · revenue -11%
  • SH
    SHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue +28%
  • MI
    MALENGO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $750k · revenue -11% · 59% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
3
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Keralink International Inc

Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.

Health
6
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
7
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
8
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
9
Middle East Investment Initiative Inc

Middle east investment initiative, inc. (meii) stimulates sustainable economic activity and long-lasting job creation in the middle east and north africa (mena) by designing and deploying finance and technical assistance programs to…

Community Improvement
10
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visionspring Inc and the most unlike its peers is Giving Wings Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyChristian Missionary Organi…Immigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%12%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%16%<5yr14%22%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/64
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
33/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CLEAR FUND — $5,000,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUNDJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $2,200,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDFOUNDERS PLEDGE INC — $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDERS PLEDGE INCARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING — $1,975,000 · PhilanthropyARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISINGPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $750,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCAPPLESEED FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 · PhilanthropyAPPLESEED FOUNDATION INCFriends Of Raising The Village Incorporated — $500,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $555,474 · PhilanthropyEducate — $2,400,000 · InternationalEducateONE ACRE FUND — $1,750,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC — $1,000,000 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT …INKOMOKO — $550,000 · InternationalINKOMOKONetwork for Empowerment & Progressive Initiatives - Nepi Inc — $357,070 · InternationalMAISHA MEDS INC — $300,000 · International+15 more — $1,454,463 · International+15 moreUBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATION US INC — $4,400,000 · OtherUBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATION …Digital Divide Data — $1,800,000 · OtherDigital Divide DataMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $698,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM IN…CareCubes Inc — $300,000 · Other+6 more — $531,400 · Other+6 moreMIT International Inc — $1,152,452 · EducationMIT Internatio…SHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $750,000 · EducationSHINING HOPE F…MALENGO INC — $750,000 · EducationMALENGO INCMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $750,000 · EducationMassachusetts …University of Chicago — $606,000 · EducationUniversity of …JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $255,250 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS …SOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC — $165,000 · Education+5 more — $294,000 · Education+5 moreEYELLIANCE INC — $2,320,000 · HealthNOORA HEALTH — $100,000 · Health+4 more — $142,612 · HealthCenter for Innovative Governance Research — $750,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY — $110,000 · Community ImprovementTHE RESOLUTION PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementEMMA'S TORCH LTD — $500,000 · Human Services+2 more — $20,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$13,730,474International$7,811,533Other$7,729,400Education$4,722,702Health$2,562,612Community Improvement$910,000Human Services$520,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CLEAR FUND — $5,000,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetEducate — $2,400,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetEYELLIANCE INC — $2,320,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $2,200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDERS PLEDGE INC — $2,000,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetARBOR BROTHERS INC DBA ARBOR RISING — $1,975,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetDigital Divide Data — $1,800,000 over 3y, 56% of budgetONE ACRE FUND — $1,750,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIT International Inc — $1,152,452 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $750,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMALENGO INC — $750,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $750,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Innovative Governance Research — $750,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetAPPLESEED FOUNDATION INC — $750,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $750,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $606,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINKOMOKO — $550,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFriends Of Raising The Village Incorporated — $500,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD — $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNetwork for Empowerment & Progressive Initiatives - Nepi Inc — $357,070 over 2y, 23% of budgetMAISHA MEDS INC — $300,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $255,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE ACTION FOR SMALLHOLDERS (CASH) COALITION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE AGENCY FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE SOMO PROJECT — $250,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetVISIONSPRING INC — $199,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetRedeem International — $170,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $165,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC — $165,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLABOR MOBILITY PARTNERSHIPS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPPLESEED INC — $131,963 over 1y, 30% of budgetSTRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT — $125,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetRocket Learning Foundation — $120,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $110,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEGAL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $105,974 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAFRICAN COLLABORATIVE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNOORA HEALTH — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALIGHT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESTORINGVISION — $73,668 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $64,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTREET BUSINESS SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetSPARK MICROGRANTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE RESOLUTION PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HIH INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Dovetail Impact Found…Skoll FundMulago FoundationRippleworks IncThe Skoll FoundationGates FoundationWellspring Philanthro…Segal Family Foundati…Imago Dei FundMarin Community Found…The Horace W Goldsmit…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23.4× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Skoll Fund · Mulago Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · The Skoll Foundation · Gates Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Imago Dei Fund · Marin Community Foundation · The Horace W Goldsmith Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Follow Your Dream Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Network for Empowerment & Progressive Initiatives - Nepi Inc — 48% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Follow Your Dream Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Follow Your Dream Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home