Skip to content

· Private foundation

Flourish Arbonne Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2020
11
Grants FY2020
9
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Flourish Arbonne Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Charities Aid Foundation America, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Flourish Arbonne Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $396k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

97
’17
100
’18
59
’19
8
’20
1
’21
1
’22
2
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.1MYouth Development$643kInternational$531kHuman Services$264kHousing & Shelter$149kCrime & Legal$126kRecreation & Sports$58kEducation$27kOther$0
02FY2020 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
$10,878
Median grant
9
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAYMAKERS$100,000
ACTIVE MINDS$100,000
COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA$75,000
STAND UP FOR KIDS - ORANGE COUNTY$50,000
STAND UP FOR KIDS - ATLANTA$40,000
STAND UP FOR KIDS - KITSAP COUNTY$10,878
CENTER FOR TEEN EMPOWERMENT$6,472
LIVING IN SAFE ALTERNATIVE INCORPORATED (LISA INC)$5,700
MAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
CRY FREEDOM MISSIONS - WAYNE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC$2,000
BEAUTY FROM ASHES RANCH$1,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $292k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%FITGIRL INC: $5k → 12%SIMON SAYS GIVE: $3k → 6%THE PEACE CENTER: $5k → 6%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $5k → 7%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $3k → 19%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $5k → 20%GIRLS EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $5k → 10%STAND WITH TRANS: $4k → 5%STAND WITH TRANS: $5k → 8%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $5k → 14%GIRLS ON THE RUN SAGINAW BAY: $3k → 18%YOUTH PASSAGEWAYS: $3k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS AID: $5k → 12%LOOKING GLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 15%BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME: $4k → 12%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $3k → 16%KIDS IN CRISIS INTERVENTION TEAM: $3k → 8%LIBERA INC: $3k → 19%CIRCESTEEM: $5k → 14%MIDDLE EARTH: $5k → 5%REINDANCER THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $5k → 11%OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $5k → 12%ST JOSEPH'S VILLA: $5k → 9%RE-MEMBER: $3k → 42%CRISPIN'S HOUSE COALITION FOR YOUTH: $4k → 7%FITGIRL INC: $4k → 12%THE PEACE CENTER: $4k → 6%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $3k → 7%TEEN ESTEEM: $5k → 9%HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $3k → 20%CARRYING HOPE: $3k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS AID: $3k → 12%MIDDLE EARTH: $5k → 5%OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $3k → 12%ST JOSEPH'S VILLA: $3k → 9%WINGS FOR SUCCESS: $3k → 6%TEEN ESTEEM: $5k → 9%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $5k → 20%TEEN ESTEEM: $5k → 9%1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 14%MASK (MOTHERS AWARENESS ON SCHOOL-AGE KIDS): $4k → 11%TEEN LIVING PROGRAMS: $5k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $75k → 14%IGNITE FORMERLY TEEN LIVING PROGRAMS: $5k → 14%LAURA'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 78 repeat orgs$708k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 74 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
154

Total granted

$1.7M
$497k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+37%

Still filing today

81%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    Active Minds Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $945k · revenue +230%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2017–2020 · $78k · revenue +197%
  • MY
    MAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $41k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • PF
    PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $21k · revenue +27%
  • CN
    CHILDHOOD NOW
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • AI
    Attitude Is Everything Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +761%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls Incorporated of the Central Coast

To inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold and to respect themselves and the world around them.Girls Incorporated of the Central Coast offers a constellation of programs that deliver innovative, multi-faceted activities designed to…

Youth Development
2
Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme

Project extreme provides innovative programming and solutions for teens in -need, their families and communities. project extreme uses a combination of experiential and intellectual learning opportunities to provide the social, educational…

Youth Development
3
Girls On the Run of Coastal Georgia

Missions: We inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.The Girls on the Run curricula, the heart of the program, provides pre-adolescent girls with the…

—
4
Los Angeles Youth Network

Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…

Human Services
5
Female Strong

Female strong is a 501c3 non-profit organization and a community of committed individuals that offer hands-on programs, mentorship, and experiences that build confidence in middle and high school girls. we support the inclusion of all…

Community Improvement
6
Girls Inc of Greater Los Angeles

Girls inc. of los angeles' mission is to empower the girls of los angeles to tap into their strengths and amplify their talents with pro-girl results-oriented programs, events and advocacy.

Youth Development
7
Girls Incorporated of San Diego County

Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. our comprehensive approach to whole girl development equips girls to nagivate gender, economic, and social barriers and grow up healthy, educated, and independent.

—
8
Girls on the Run of Central Illinois

We envision a world where every girl knows and activates her limitless potential and is free to boldly pursue her dreams. Girls on the Run strives to recognize our power and responsibility to be intentional in our decision making to…

Youth Development
9
Girl Talk Inc

We inspire all girls to be confident leaders through peer-to-peer mentoring programs.

—
10
Girls Incorporated of San Antonio

Girls Inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. Our comprehensive approach to whole girl development equips girls to navigate gender, economic, and social barriers and grow up healthy, educated, and independent.

Human Services
11
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
12
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waymakers; the most unlike its peers is Dream Jamaica. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

171 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 171 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
160/171
Grantees still filing
124/171
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Active Minds Inc: $944,836 · HealthActive Minds Inc+9 more: $64,144 · Health+9 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $744,042 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AM…+2 more: $7,500 · PhilanthropyStandUp for Kids: $50,000 · OtherStandUp for KidsMAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $41,054 · OtherMAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERV…STAND UP FOR KIDS - ATLANTA: $40,000 · OtherSTAND UP FOR KIDS - ATLANT…KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,136 · Other+109 more: $568,406 · Other+109 moreCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $77,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT H…Teen Esteem: $15,000 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDHAM: $13,000 · Human ServicesIGNITE: $10,000 · Human ServicesGENAUSTIN: $10,000 · Human ServicesHuman Options Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesMiddle Earth: $10,000 · Human Services+29 more: $152,800 · Human Services+29 moreWAYMAKERS: $100,000 · Crime & LegalBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $16,000 · Crime & LegalPREVENTION EDUCATION INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalTHE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE: $10,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $10,000 · Crime & LegalJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentDIAMOND IN THE RAW: $9,500 · Youth DevelopmentCRYSTAL LAKE TEEN CENTER: $7,932 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK: $7,800 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal GLOW: $7,800 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $6,275 · Youth DevelopmentGirls on the Run Rhode Island: $5,100 · Youth DevelopmentTHREE AND A HALF ACRES YOGA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOORPARK & SIMI VALLEY INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF ORANGE COUNTY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP FIRE CENTRAL COAST OF CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE DUNDEE TOWNSHIP: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Thrive Inc: $5,000 · Youth Development+7 more: $21,100 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $10,000 · EducationTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK AND GREATER EAST VALLEY INC: $8,500 · EducationAttitude Is Everything Foundation Inc: $7,680 · EducationTHE GARAGE COMMUNITY & YOUTH CENTER: $7,500 · EducationEmbright Education: $2,700 · EducationORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS: $2,500 · EducationEVERYBODY DANCE LA: $2,500 · EducationMidtown-Metro Achievement Centers: $2,500 · Education
Health$1,008,980Philanthropy$751,542Other$724,596Human Services$298,300Crime & Legal$151,000Youth Development$138,007Education$43,880

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetActive Minds Inc: $944,836 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $744,042 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWAYMAKERS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $77,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetStandUp for Kids: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $41,054 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,136 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $21,007 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $16,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPATHWAY CARING FOR CHILDREN: $15,994 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetStorycatchers: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTeen Esteem: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGAY & LESBIAN COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPREVENTION EDUCATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FUTURES: $13,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPACER CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIGNITE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGENAUSTIN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE: $10,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAREERS THROUGH CULINARY ARTS PROGRAM DBA CULINARY CAREERS PROGRAM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAD CAMP INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMiddle Earth: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetST JOSEPH'S VILLA: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIAMOND IN THE RAW: $9,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetLIVING IN SAFE ALTERNATIVES INC: $9,380 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PEACE CENTER INC: $8,795 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCancer Support Community Arizona: $8,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BURBANK AND GREATER EAST VALLEY INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetStand With Trans: $8,316 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCIRCESTEEM INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCRYSTAL LAKE TEEN CENTER: $7,932 over 2y, 11% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BUENA PARK: $7,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAHA ATTITUDE HARMONY ACHIEVEMENT: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING DREAMS PROJECT: $7,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE GARAGE COMMUNITY & YOUTH CENTER: $7,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetChildren's Home Society of North Carolina Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA23.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Insurance Industry Charitable Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Girls on the Run International Inc · Orange County's United Way · The Green Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Croul Family Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flourish Arbonne Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flourish Arbonne Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Prevention Education Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Middle Earth: 30% of income from government
  • Looking Glass Community Services: 18% of income from government
  • The Center for Teen Empowerment Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Boys & Girls Aid Society of Oregon: 3% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Flourish Arbonne Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Flourish Arbonne Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Flourish Arbonne’s filings →

More from the funding graph