Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Nevada · Nonprofit

CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE

CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE (Nevada) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $433,434 to it, the largest being CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($185,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 85% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$72k
Revenue FY2023
9
Funders on record
$433k
Grants received
$-27286
Net assets
7/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 80%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($173k) Expenses 100 ($185k) Net assets 100 ($123)2018 Revenue 63 ($109k) Expenses 55 ($103k) Net assets 5358 ($7k)2019 Revenue 63 ($108k) Expenses 67 ($124k) Net assets -7677 ($-9443)2020 Revenue 70 ($121k) Expenses 63 ($117k) Net assets -4329 ($-5325)2021 Revenue 85 ($147k) Expenses 67 ($123k) Net assets 15266 ($19k)2022 Revenue 41 ($70k) Expenses 64 ($119k) Net assets -24508 ($-30145)2023 Revenue 42 ($72k) Expenses 37 ($69k) Net assets -22184 ($-27286)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (42)Expenses (37)Net assets (-22184)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$13k
17
$6k
18
$16k
19
$4k
20
$24k
21
$49k
22
$3k
23
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $45k → $54k.

5 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)85% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE.

43%
largest funder
83%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 44% · 2018 62% · 2019 91% · 2020 32% · 2021 44% · 2022 45% · 2023 46%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 78% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

85% of CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $67k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Nevada, across 3 states.

NY
CA
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Nevada out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $366k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nevada

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE?
CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE (Nevada) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $433,434 to it, the largest being CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($185,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 85% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $433,434 in grants to CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE?
CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $185,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CAMP TLC TOGETHER LIVING A CHALLENGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nevada. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing