Skip to content

· Private foundation

Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$1.3MEnvironment$1.1MHealth$881kPublic Safety & Disaster$876kEmployment$682kEducation$462kFood & Nutrition$248kHuman Services$228kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $634k
$24,412
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVE2ASIA$95,200
PLANET WATER FOUNDATION$89,500
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$80,000
Individual grant recipient$62,334
THAAGAM FOUNDATION$55,000
SUZHOU CHENXIA CHARITY FOUNDATION$52,397
Individual grant recipient$50,000
KANNER FOUNDATION OF TAIWAN$50,000
UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS MEXICO AC$50,000
KANNER FOUNDATION OF TAIWAN$50,000
UNDER THE MANGO TREE SOCIETY$46,759
PERSATUAN KEBAJIKAN HAEMODIALSIS ST ANNE BM$38,467
SAMPARC-SOCIAL ACTION FOR MANPOWER CREATION$37,589
SWADES FOUNDATION$36,187
ASHOKA EMPRENDEDORES SOCIALES A C$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 37% of grant dollars ($2.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 63% that went abroad ($4.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $465k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS INC: $5k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $80k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX

Beyond the US: 63% of all-years giving ($4.2M)

18 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$729k · 24 grants
Brazil$553k · 27 grants
Romania$533k · 17 grants
China$519k · 12 grants
Mexico$503k · 18 grants
Poland$239k · 19 grants
Singapore$234k · 6 grants
Hungary$201k · 9 grants
Austria$186k · 3 grants
Taiwan$160k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation)’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 15%.

Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation)lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 69% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 30 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
73

Total granted

$2.9M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+24%

Still filing today

23%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2020–2024 · $477k · revenue +38%
  • PW
    PLANET WATER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $266k · revenue +51%
  • HS
    HOPE SERVICES
    3× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -74%
  • G
    GIVE2ASIA
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TA
    THE AMITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $67k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Silicon Valley Social Venture Fund - SV2

Silicon Valley Social Venture Funds (SV2) mission is to unleash the talents and resources of the Bay Area community to achieve meaningful social impact. SV2 works to build the organizational capacity of our Nonprofit Grantees and Impact…

Philanthropy
3
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
4
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
5
Social Finance Inc

Social finance builds innovative partnerships and investments that realign systems to measurably improve lives.

Human Services
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
Technoserve Inc

Technoserve's mission is to fight poverty by helping people build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes.

International
8
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
9
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
10
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
11
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
12
Silicon Valley Defense Working Group Co

Silicon Valley Defense Group convenes experts in technology, investment, and government for discussions on how to better collaborate between the various groups. The comments and topics are then published on our website to help educate and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lupus Foundation of Northern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANET WATER FOUNDATION: $266,180 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $185,618 · Other+133 more: $4,544,529 · Other+133 moreGIVE2ASIA: $368,200 · InternationalGIVE2ASIAUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · InternationalUNITED NAT…Save The Children Federation Inc: $27,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $477,000 · Human Services+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $180,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $70,000 · Community ImprovementNPOWER INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE SERVICES: $50,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25,000 · EmploymentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 · HealthLUPUS FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25,000 · HealthHealthFinders Collaborative Inc: $20,000 · HealthINROADS INC: $50,237 · Education
Other$4,996,327International$632,200Human Services$497,000Community Improvement$300,000Employment$75,000Health$70,000Education$50,237

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $477,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $368,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPLANET WATER FOUNDATION: $266,180 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHISPANIC FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $70,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINROADS INC: $50,237 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE SERVICES: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT): $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNPOWER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealthFinders Collaborative Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWAYPOINT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDZONE MEMPHIS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe PLUS Company Inc: $10,710 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Alternatives To Violent Environments: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GIVE2ASIA ↗
  • Who funds PLANET WATER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds INROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE GREAT SPRINGS PROJECT INC (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds NPOWER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sobrato Family FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sobrato Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation)?

Find your warmest path to Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Flex Foundation (F/K/A Flextronics Foundation)’s filings →

More from the funding graph