Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fellowship Foundation Inc

Develop and maintain an informal association of people bandedtogether, to go out as "ambassadors of reconciliation," modeling theprinciples of jesus, based on loving god and loving others.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$1.9MInternational$62kPublic Benefit$31kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$7kCivil Rights$7kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $44,285 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,404,211 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,359,926 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$6,075
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Livingstone Community Church$35,000
Mt Airy Center$6,075
Life and Hope Foundation$3,210
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DC Dreamcenter: $6k → 14%JOY TO THE WORLD: $18k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
MI
OR
NV
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $3.4M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $3.1M to organizations and $294k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$2.9M · 86% · 5 grants · 4 people

Stated purpose: Building a school in Liberia · Ministry Work · School in Kampala, Uganda

Middle East and North Africa$178k · 5% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Building a school in Lebanon · Orphan care in Jordan

East Asia and the Pacific$117k · 3% · 3 people

Stated purpose: Ministry work around the country

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$87k · 3% · 2 grants · 4 people

Stated purpose: Ministry work around the country

Central America and the Caribbean$79k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Water Project in developing countries

North America (Canada and Mexico)$25k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Water Project in developing countries

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 6 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$1.6M
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-32%
+40%

Still filing today

33%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MT AIRY CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $848k
  • LC
    LIVINGSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $647k
  • GV
    GREEN VALLEY CHRISTIAN CENTER
    2× · 2018–2022 · $19k

Funded once

  • E
    EQUIPNET
    one grant, 2024 · $97k · revenue 0%
  • EI
    Ethiopian Impact Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $61k · revenue +398% · 57% of their budget
  • NP
    NATIONAL PRAYER BREAKFAST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $47k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion
2
Discipling Marketplace Leaders

To empower the local church to establish and run successful Marketplace Ministries, empowering, equipping, encouraging and discipling business owners.

International
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Disciple Makers Network

To connect indigenous ministers with resources in fulfilling the Great Commission.

Religion
6
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

7
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
8
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
9
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
10
Contagious Disciple Making

Helping the hardest to reach people of North America Develop a relationship with Christ

Human Services
11
New City Networks

New City Networks exists to bring whole life transformation to under-resourced youth in the US and globally. In the US we operate two full leadership development programs that employ over 60 youth 200 days a year.

Youth Development
12
Discipleship Global Inc

Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joy to the World Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr16%14%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr11%33%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr16%8%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr11%76%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,824

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MT AIRY CENTER — $847,808 · OtherMT AIRY CENTERLIVINGSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $646,546 · OtherLIVINGSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH+9 more — $79,522 · OtherEQUIPNET — $96,674 · ReligionEQUIPNETNATIONAL PRAYER BREAKFAST FOUNDATION — $46,800 · ReligionNATIONAL PR…Oklahoma Capitol Culture Inc — $31,006 · ReligionOklahoma Ca…Pro Athletes Outreach — $26,514 · ReligionPro Athlete…+2 more — $1,475 · ReligionThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $104,585 · PhilanthropyEthiopian Impact Inc — $60,986 · InternationalJoy To The World Foundation — $18,100 · Human ServicesStoneworks International Inc — $16,306 · Human ServicesDC Dreamcenter — $6,346 · Human ServicesRESET180 — $6,543 · Civil RightsYOUTH MENTORING WORLDWIDE INC — $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentFLY FISHING COLLABORATIVE — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $100 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,573,876Religion$202,469Philanthropy$104,585International$60,986Human Services$40,752Civil Rights$6,543Youth Development$6,500Recreation & Sports$5,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $104,585 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUIPNET — $96,674 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEthiopian Impact Inc — $60,986 over 1y, 57% of budgetOklahoma Capitol Culture Inc — $31,006 over 1y, 12% of budgetPro Athletes Outreach — $26,514 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJoy To The World Foundation — $18,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStoneworks International Inc — $16,306 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLeadership Development DBA Centered — $12,258 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRESET180 — $6,543 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING WORLDWIDE INC — $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDC Dreamcenter — $6,346 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFLY FISHING COLLABORATIVE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE FELLOWS PROGRAM INC — $475 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREDEMPTIONWORKS INTERNATIONAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS14.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fellowship Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph