How much does Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation give?

Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation reported 17 grants totaling $263,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 23 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (39%), Health (26%), Education (9%).

Who are Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Share Our Strength ($380k), American Cancer Society Inc ($206k), Humane World for Animals Inc ($50k).

Does Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 11% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Mightycause Charitable Foundation, Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc, The Batchelor Foundation Inc.

Where is Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation based?

Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation is based in FL.

Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation

Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$263k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$105k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$585kHealth$394kEducation$131kAnimals$74kArts & Culture$67kInternational$58kHuman Services$43kPhilanthropy$41kOther$0

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k11 grants · $35k
$10k–50k5 grants · $123k
$50k–250k1 grant · $105k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
SHARE OUR STRENGTH	$105,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY	$35,000
MEALS ON WHEELS	$35,000
BAPTIST HEALTH SO FLORIDA FOUNDAT	$33,000
NPR	$10,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY	$10,000
SMILE TRAIN	$5,000
NPR	$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA	$5,000
PI KAPPA PHI FOUNDATION	$5,000
Individual grant recipient	$5,000
Individual grant recipient	$3,000
FOR PETE SAKE RESCUE	$3,000
DEFENDER OF WILDLIFE	$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.2M · 29 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%

+23%

Still filing today

69%

74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationInternationalAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HW
Humane World for Animals Inc
6× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +31%
PK
PI KAPPA PHI FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +164%
DC
DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC
7× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +104%

Funded once

WC
WORLD CENTER KITCHEN INC
one grant, 2022 · $50k
ES
EASTER SEALS
one grant, 2018 · $25k
IR
International Rescue Committee INC
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -2%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit

World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture

Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment

Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

National Geographic Society

To increase and diffuse geographic knowledge in the broadest sense, using the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of the world.

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Actors' Playhouse Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

37/37

Grantees still filing

28/37

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$951,332Health$244,500Education$136,000Animals$72,000International$58,000Community Improvement$12,500Human Services$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL14.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fanny & Stephen Rosenak Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Fanny & Stephen Rosenak’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home