How much did DUNSPAUGH DALTON FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of DUNSPAUGH DALTON FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

foundationshealthchancekidscarechildren's

2019

health

2020

special olympicsmuseumcasaboys girlschildren'ssouthcancer

2021

symphonyboys girlschildren's

2022

waydadecasacancerkidssouth

2023

southgirlscarechildren's

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $23k
$10k–50k18 grants · $269k
$50k–250k8 grants · $875k
$250k+1 grant · $300k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$46M

Total assets

Largest grants

BAPTIST HOSPITAL SOUTH FL FD$300,000
MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC$200,000
BARRY UNIVERSITY$200,000
ZOO MIAMI$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIAMI$100,000
SERAPHIC FIRE$100,000
RANCHO CIELO INC$75,000
CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP$50,000
CASA FAMILA INC$50,000
MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$49,000
FRIENDS OF THE COMMODORE TRAIL$40,000
MARINE LIFE STUDIES$15,000
YMCA OF SOUTH FLORIDA$15,000
CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$15,000
LADIES EMPOWERMENT AND$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$9.9M · 87 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

87 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 65 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$9.9M

$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%

+64%

Still filing today

53%

51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BU
BARRY UNIVERSITY
7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +3%
TG
THELMA GIBSON HEALTH INITIATIVE
3× · 2018–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +46% · 62% of their budget
MM
MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC
7× · 2017–2024 · $775k · revenue +40%

Funded once

VM
VIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TR
one grant, 2020 · $100k
FG
FLORIDA GRAND OPERA INC
one grant, 2022 · $85k · revenue -92%
PI
PARTNERS IN HEALTH
one grant, 2023 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Miami

—

Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education

Miami Children's Health System Inc

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of nicklaus children's hospital and its affiliated entities.

Health

Central Miami Intergroup

—

Miami Childrens Initiative Inc

The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…

Community Improvement

Institute for Child and Family

The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.

—

Miami-Dade Foundation for

To prepare our students to be independent multilingual citizens in a global society

Education

Federation of Families Miami-Dade

To empower, guide and support youth and families by providing them with the skills to become strong advocates for their needs and well being.

Human Services

The Florida Center for Early Childhood

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services

Miami Homes for All Inc

Miami Homes For All's mission is to ensure that everyone in Miami-Dade has a safe, affordable place to call home.

Human Services

Museum of Contemporary Art Inc

The mission of the musuem of contemporary art is to contemporary art accesible to diverse audiences - especially underserved populations through the collection, preservation and exhibition of the best of contemporary art and its art…

Arts & Culture

Musicall Inc

Musicall, Inc. mission is to provide comprehensive music education as a critical component of children's integral education, fostering social and emotional skills and inspiring a lifelong love of learning.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chapman Partnership Inc and the most unlike its peers is Monterey Jazz Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%2/104

the rest of the field

15%

2,091/13,984

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

102 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

100/102

Grantees still filing

82/102

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,085,570Education$1,625,500Human Services$1,211,301Arts & Culture$1,124,000Health$1,101,190Youth Development$255,000Housing & Shelter$191,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Batchelor Foundation IncFL66.6× affinity30 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · The Kirk Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Dr John T Macdonald Foundation Inc · Barnet Segal Charitable Trust · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Anthony Abraham Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DUNSPAUGH DALTON FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

37get no government money at all

4rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE U DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 455434927 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE U DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 73% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DUNSPAUGH DALTON FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

102 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

DUNSPAUGH DALTON FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

102 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph