Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fannie E Rippel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$503kHuman Services$218kScience & Tech$200kFood & Nutrition$123kEducation$98kPhilanthropy$45kPublic Benefit$25kCommunity Improvement$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$6,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$88M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES$50,000
ZUFALL HEALTH$22,500
COUNCIL OF FOUNDATIONS$6,500
GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH$6,150
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLACK MOTHERS IN POWER: $23k → 10%YWCA BUCKS COUNTY: $23k → 6%CONEXION LATINA NEWPORT: $25k → 7%JEWISH HOME FAMILY: $23k → 7%NORWESCAP: $23k → 7%FREEDOM FIRST ENTERPRISES: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
DE
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 22% of Fannie E Rippel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 41% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Fannie E Rippel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$548k · 11 repeat orgs$698k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
30

Total granted

$548k
$698k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+18%

Still filing today

91%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +16%
  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    4× · 2020–2023 · $145k · revenue +56%
  • ZH
    ZUFALL HEALTH CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SD
    SAY DETROIT HEALTH CLINIC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TL
    T Leroy Jefferson Medical Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
2
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
3
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates

The organizations are committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
4
Family Health Initiatives Inc

Our mission is to help hospitals, nonprofits and government improve the health and well being of communities.

Health
5
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
6
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

7
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
8
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
9
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
10
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
11
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
12
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Black Mothers in Power. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Immigrant Worker SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Jewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $50,000 · OtherNATIONA ACADEMY OF SCIENCESSAY DETROIT HEALTH CLINIC — $25,000 · OtherSAY DETROIT HEALTH CLINICZUFALLS HEALTH — $25,000 · OtherZUFALLS HEALTHCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NJ — $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NJALL OF US OR NONE — $25,000 · OtherALL OF US OR NONECOMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN NOURISH NJ — $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN NOURISH NJNAMI Washtenaw County — $25,000 · OtherNAMI Washtenaw CountyCITIZENS LEAGUE — $25,000 · OtherCITIZENS LEAGUEHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INC — $22,500 · OtherYWCA KALAMAZOO — $22,500 · OtherHOMEBRIDGE INC — $22,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherHabilitative Systems Inc — $22,500 · OtherHEALTHIER DEMOCRACY — $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ORANGE INC — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ORANGE INCGROW IT GREEN MORRISTOWN INC — $25,000 · OtherGROW IT GREEN MORRISTOWN INC+5 more — $26,100 · Other+5 moreFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $145,000 · HealthFoundation for Morris…ZUFALL HEALTH CENTER INC — $70,000 · HealthZUFALL HEALTH CENTER …T Leroy Jefferson Medical Society Inc — $25,000 · HealthT Leroy Jefferson Med…NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $200,000 · Science & TechNATIONAL ACADEMY O…JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesJERSEY BATTERED W…CUMACECHO INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCUMACECHO INCE3 ENDEAVORS FKA FREEDOM FIRST ENTERPRISES — $25,000 · Human ServicesE3 ENDEAVORS FKA …CONEXION LATINA NEWPORT — $25,000 · Human ServicesCONEXION LATINA N…YWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY — $22,500 · Human ServicesYWCA OF BUCKS COU…THE JEWISH HOME FAMILY INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH HOME F…NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NEW JER…Black Mothers in Power — $22,500 · Human ServicesBlack Mothers in …PROVIDENCE CENTER — $50,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $22,500 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISHNJ INC — $22,500 · Food & NutritionGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH — $30,900 · Philanthropy+1 more — $550 · Philanthropy
Other$458,600Health$240,000Science & Tech$200,000Human Services$195,000Education$73,000Food & Nutrition$47,500Philanthropy$31,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center — $145,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetZUFALL HEALTH CENTER INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH — $30,900 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetT Leroy Jefferson Medical Society Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ORANGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCUMACECHO INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetE3 ENDEAVORS FKA FREEDOM FIRST ENTERPRISES — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNAMI Washtenaw County — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCITIZENS LEAGUE — $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGROW IT GREEN MORRISTOWN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetHEALTHY MOTHERS HEALTHY BABIES COALITION OF GA INC — $22,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetYWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY — $22,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME FAMILY INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOMEBRIDGE INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlack Mothers in Power — $22,500 over 1y, 23% of budgetHabilitative Systems Inc — $22,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNOURISHNJ INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY GRANTMAKERS INC — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPY NEW YORK INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fannie E Rippel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 32%
  • Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc40% of income from government
  • Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc38% of income from government
  • Zufall Health Center Inc32% of income from government
  • Nourishnj Inc27% of income from government
  • Cumacecho Inc25% of income from government
  • Black Mothers in Power18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fannie E Rippel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fannie E Rippel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph