Skip to content
Fanatics All in Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Fanatics All in Foundation

Our mission is to create positive & lasting change across the communities in which we all live & work through a commitment of time & strategic philanthropic initiatives.

$412k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$53MRecreation & Sports$374kHuman Services$250kHealth$225kPhilanthropy$165kYouth Development$105kEducation$40kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $399,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $412,296 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,796 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FANATICS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$150,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA$42,500
K-9 FOR WARRIORS$25,000
WOMEN'S SPORTS FOUNDATION$25,000
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL$25,000
MAKE-A-WISH CENTRAL & NORTHERN FL CH$20,000
MAKE-A-WISH METRO NY CHAPTER$20,000
IMPACT PHILANTHROPY GROUP$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY$15,000
MARCUS GRAHAM PROJECT$15,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$15,000
MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY$12,000
BLACK SPORT BUSINESS ACADEMY$10,000
JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Make-A-Wish America: $50k → 11%JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%BABY2BABY: $250k → 14%MAKE A WISH OF METRO NY: $25k → 17%VICTIMS OF TERROR (MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA): $25k → 20%KIPS BAY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $10k → 28%MARCUS GRAHAM PROJECT: $15k → 14%No Kid Hungry by Share Our Strength: $13.0M → 14%K-9 FOR WARRIORS: $25k → 6%Special Olympics Florida Inc: $150k → 10%MAKE A WISH CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA: $50k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY: $15k → 13%FANATICS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%Univ of Wisconsin Foundation: $79k → 10%Univ of Tennessee Foundation: $191k → 12%IMPACT PHILANTHROPY GROUP: $15k → 13%Feeding America: $13.2M → 14%University of Illinois Foundation: $72k → 19%Meals on Wheels America: $12.7M → 7%BLACK SPORT BUSINESS ACADEMY: $10k → 7%MAXX CROSBY FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%MAKE-A-WISH AMERICA: $50k → 11%MAKE-A-WISH METRO NY CHAPTER: $20k → 17%EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $25k → 14%Special Olympics USA Games 2022 Organizing Committ: $82k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH CENTRAL & NORTHERN FL CH: $20k → 13%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY: $15k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NE FLORIDA: $20k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS OF AMERICA: $35k → 13%WOMEN'S SPORTS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%World Central Kitchen: $13.1M → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA: $75k → 10%TEACH FOR AMERICA: $15k → 17%SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA: $43k → 10%MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
NV
PA
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

1%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 5 repeat orgs$53M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$513k
$53M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+40%

Still filing today

100%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $302k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $268k · revenue +18%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +6%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13M · revenue +40%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $13M · revenue +21%
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2020 · $13M · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
5
Usa Football Inc

Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…

Recreation & Sports
6
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education
7
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of the mid-atlantic creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Make-a-Wish Foundation International

None

Human Services
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

Health
12
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Magen Abraham Yeshiva Inc Congregation Bnei Ovadia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Feeding America: $13,200,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $12,722,391 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICASHARE OUR STRENGTH: $13,039,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTH+11 more: $587,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,131,802 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $191,123 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $162,223 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $78,620 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $72,000 · Education+2 more: $30,000 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $267,500 · Recreation & SportsSpecial Olympics USA Games 2022 Organizing Committee Inc: $81,894 · Recreation & SportsWomens Sports Foundation: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFANATICS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $10,000 · Youth Development
Food & Nutrition$25,922,391Other$13,626,000International$13,131,802Education$533,966Recreation & Sports$384,394Philanthropy$150,000Youth Development$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $13,200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,131,802 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $13,039,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $12,722,391 over 1y, 18% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $267,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBABY2BABY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC: $191,123 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $162,223 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFANATICS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics USA Games 2022 Organizing Committee Inc: $81,894 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $78,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $72,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA: $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF METRO NEW YORK AND WESTERN NEW YORK: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Sports Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Marcus Graham Project: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetIMPACT PHILANTHROPY GROUP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nfl Foundation IncThe Goldman Sachs Cha…The Blackbaud Giving …National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
Nfl Foundation IncNY15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nfl Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fanatics All in Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fanatics All in Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fanatics All in Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fanatics All in Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fanatics All in’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home