· Public charity
Fanatics All in Foundation
Our mission is to create positive & lasting change across the communities in which we all live & work through a commitment of time & strategic philanthropic initiatives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $399,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $412,296 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,796 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k13 grants · $250k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FANATICS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA | $42,500 |
| K-9 FOR WARRIORS | $25,000 |
| WOMEN'S SPORTS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH METRO NY CHAPTER | $20,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH CENTRAL & NORTHERN FL CH | $20,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY | $15,000 |
| MARCUS GRAHAM PROJECT | $15,000 |
| IMPACT PHILANTHROPY GROUP | $15,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $15,000 |
| MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY | $12,000 |
| JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BLACK SPORT BUSINESS ACADEMY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $302k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $268k · revenue +18%
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +6%- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +16%
Funded once
Feeding Americagraduatedone grant, 2020 · $13M · revenue +40%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCone grant, 2020 · $13M · revenue +21%
SHARE OUR STRENGTHone grant, 2020 · $13M · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…
Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…
To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.
The make-a-wish foundation of the mid-atlantic creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
None
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Magen Abraham Yeshiva Inc Congregation Bnei Ovadia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FANATICS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Special Olympics USA Games 2022 Organizing Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF METRO NEW YORK AND WESTERN NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
- Who funds EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds The Marcus Graham Project ↗
- Who funds IMPACT PHILANTHROPY GROUP ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MAXX CROSBY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kips Bay Boys & Girls Club ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nfl Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fanatics All in Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fanatics All in Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fanatics All in Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.