Skip to content
Family Health International Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Family Health International Inc

Fhi 360 is a global development organization delivering multi-disciplinary, evidence-based approaches to improve the health and socio-economic status of millions of people in disadvantaged communities throughout the world.

$156M
Granted FY2025still arriving
146
Grants FY2025still arriving
36
States reached
$5.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$538MInternational$214MEducation$111MCommunity Improvement$27MArts & Culture$11MFood & Nutrition$7.0MYouth Development$6.3MScience & Tech$4.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 146 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 146 grants below total $72,289,028, the rows itemized in this filing. The $156,125,595 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,836,567 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k51 grants · $5.8M
  • $250k+50 grants · $65M
$108,981
Median grant
36
States reached
$348M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$5,755,194
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE$4,981,658
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$4,551,836
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER$3,919,654
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$3,620,182
GOAL USA INC$2,675,252
POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL$2,626,527
THE TRUSTEES COLUMBIA$2,374,190
PALLADIUM INTERNATIONAL LLC$2,010,862
EMORY UNIVERSITY$2,002,493
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,999,979
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE HEALTH SOLUTIONS$1,813,990
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$1,774,332
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$1,731,604
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF UCSF$1,678,336
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Abounding Prosperity Inc: $366k → 14%CENTER FOR SOCIAL INTEGRITY CSI: $26k → 16%PHOENIX YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $309k → 22%PROJECT BUILD SWFL INC: $232k → 10%Take Action Global: $137k → 12%Erikas Closet: $65k → 10%Abounding Prosperity Inc: $321k → 14%Phoenix Youth and Family: $304k → 22%Global Black Gay Men Connect Corp: $142k → 14%Take Action Global: $69k → 12%ERIKAS CLOSET: $58k → 10%Phoenix Youth and Family: $166k → 22%TAKE ACTION GLOBAL: $28k → 12%Abounding Prosperity Inc: $180k → 14%PHOENIX YOUTH AND FAMILY: $141k → 22%GLOBAL BLACK GAY MEN CONNECT CORPORATION: $109k → 14%RAO Community Health: $20k → 10%AVAC: $782k → 17%PHOENIX YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $136k → 22%Global Black Pride and Gl: $22k → 14%RAO COMMUNITY HEALTH: $18k → 10%AVAC: $742k → 17%Phoenix Youth and Family: $132k → 22%AVAC: $557k → 17%ABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $23k → 14%PHOENIX YOUTH AND FAMILY: $79k → 22%AVAC: $507k → 17%AVAC: $463k → 17%AVAC: $440k → 17%OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $437k → 11%INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE: $204k → 19%AVAC: $351k → 17%OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $393k → 11%Interchurch Medical Assis: $115k → 19%AVAC: $228k → 17%OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $353k → 11%AVAC: $103k → 17%Our Piece of the Pie Inc: $335k → 11%Our Piece of the Pie Inc: $241k → 11%OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $222k → 11%Our Piece of the Pie Inc: $81k → 11%YMCA OF THE USA: $92k → 14%YMCA OF THE USA: $27k → 14%YMCA of the USA: $23k → 14%AIDS Healthcare Foundation: $343k → 14%AIDS Healthcare Foundation: $207k → 14%AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $52k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $84M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$52M · 62% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

East Asia and the Pacific$10M · 12% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Central America and the Caribbean$5.3M · 6% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

South Asia$4.3M · 5% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Russia and Neighboring States$3.7M · 4% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Middle East and North Africa$3.2M · 4% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

South America$2.3M · 3% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.2M · 3% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

North America (Canada and Mexico)$901k · 1% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HIV/AIDS · GLOBAL HEALTH · SOCIO-ECONOMIC

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$909M · 308 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

308 repeat relationships: 96 still active in FY2025, 212 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

308
105

Total granted

$909M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+10%

Still filing today

53%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HK
    HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $104M · revenue +44%
  • IN
    INTERNEWS NETWORK
    7× · 2017–2023 · $47M · revenue +109%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33M · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • HI
    HEALTHRIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $4.1M · revenue -40% · 28% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION PCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $677k · revenue +96%
  • NG
    NAVANTI GROUP LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $640k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
3
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
4
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
7
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
8
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
11
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
12
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Steinman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 461 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
224/234
Grantees still filing
147/234
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $51,891,117 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO: $48,936,316 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT …POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $25,490,401 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONALTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $14,789,539 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $14,011,676 · OtherDeloitte Consulting LLP: $13,609,285 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $13,445,795 · Other+96 more: $195,610,519 · Other+96 moreHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $104,315,837 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONALPACT INC: $28,324,636 · InternationalPACT INCCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $14,424,527 · InternationalHDIInc: $12,627,164 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $10,142,029 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $9,837,510 · InternationalMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $9,656,150 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,496,404 · International+31 more: $73,658,648 · International+31 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $44,033,852 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUM…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $33,095,229 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS…THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $16,027,549 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITYEmory University: $15,558,949 · EducationEmory UniversityThe George Washington University: $14,793,229 · EducationThe George Washington…Yale University: $11,277,666 · EducationYale UniversityUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,221,977 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBU…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,103,040 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVE…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $9,644,109 · Education+16 more: $22,997,416 · Education+16 moreFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $13,689,792 · HealthFred Hutc…MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION: $13,030,081 · HealthMAGEE-WOM…GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $9,652,005 · HealthGEORGIA T…THE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE: $8,573,474 · HealthTHE HEKTO…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,653,897 · HealthBETH ISRA…INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,586,234 · HealthINTRAHEAL…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,418,782 · HealthST JUDE C…AVENIR HEALTH INC: $3,200,206 · HealthEqual Access International: $3,107,247 · HealthFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,955,302 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center: $2,861,460 · Health+10 more: $7,520,665 · Health+10 moreINTERNEWS NETWORK: $46,764,990 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $2,549,280 · Arts & CultureAIDS VACCINE ADVOCACY COALITION INC: $4,171,894 · Human ServicesOUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC: $2,062,747 · Human ServicesPHOENIX YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,266,570 · Human ServicesABOUNDING PROSPERITY INC: $889,752 · Human ServicesAIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $602,570 · Human ServicesRED RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $492,223 · Human ServicesAfro Pride Federation Inc: $462,434 · Human Services+1 more: $318,220 · Human ServicesFSG INC: $1,803,029 · Community ImprovementTHE GREATER LOUISVILLE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $1,726,298 · Community Improvement
Other$377,784,648International$272,482,905Education$187,753,016Health$80,249,145Arts & Culture$49,314,270Human Services$10,266,410Community Improvement$3,529,327

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $104,315,837 over 9y, 23% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $46,764,990 over 7y, 15% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $44,033,852 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $33,095,229 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPACT INC: $28,324,636 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $25,490,401 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $16,027,549 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetEmory University: $15,558,949 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University: $14,793,229 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $14,424,527 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $13,689,792 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION: $13,030,081 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetHDIInc: $12,627,164 over 9y, 100% of budgetYale University: $11,277,666 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $10,638,508 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,221,977 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $10,142,029 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,103,040 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $9,837,510 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $9,656,150 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $9,652,005 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $9,644,109 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,496,404 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC: $8,858,387 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTHE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE: $8,573,474 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $7,608,762 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $5,935,093 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD LEARNING INC: $5,736,415 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetPATH: $5,723,847 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,653,897 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,617,011 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,586,234 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,418,782 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC: $4,391,126 over 8y, 13% of budgetGOAL USA INC: $4,207,596 over 2y, 23% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RESEARCH & EXCHANGES BOARD INC: $4,185,292 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetAIDS VACCINE ADVOCACY COALITION INC: $4,171,894 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetSEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND: $4,091,466 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,089,522 over 1y, 28% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $3,998,838 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $3,393,613 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION FOR EMPLOYMENT: $3,230,840 over 4y, 20% of budgetAVENIR HEALTH INC: $3,200,206 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetEqual Access International: $3,107,247 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,955,302 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $2,861,460 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,654,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $2,549,280 over 5y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds INTERNEWS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PACT INC ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HDIInc ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEKTOEN INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationJsi Research & Traini…Johns Hopkins Univers…PathJhpiego CorporationGlobal CommunitiesPopulation Services I…The Rockefeller Found…Clinton Health Access…University of Pittsbu…Cooperative for Assis…Magee-Womens Research…
Gates FoundationWA48.6× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Path · Jhpiego Corporation · Global Communities · Population Services International · The Rockefeller Foundation · Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc · University of Pittsburgh · Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc · Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Health International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Health International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Management Sciences for Health Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • World Learning Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Our Piece of the Pie Inc: 21% of income from government
  • International Youth Foundation: 17% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc: 3% of income from government
  • National Center On Institutions and Alternatives Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Avenir Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 461 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Family Health International’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home