· Public charity
Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc
The cooperative for assistance and relief everywhere, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $13,750,275 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $177,628,012 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $163,877,737 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $650k
- $250k+14 grants · $13M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WATERAID AMERICA INC | $2,486,544 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $2,113,746 |
| HOWARD DELAFIELD INTERNATIONAL | $1,415,597 |
| THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $994,687 |
| EMORY UNIVERSITY GRANTS | $893,847 |
| GLOBAL IMPACT | $841,399 |
| INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES | $800,658 |
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND US INC | $701,875 |
| MERCY COPS INTERNATIONAL | $644,002 |
| INTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION | $605,827 |
| MAP INTERNATIONAL | $424,274 |
| INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH | $404,437 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $396,558 |
| CROWN AGENTS USA | $270,686 |
| FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL | $215,416 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $164M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: 15 · 14 · 22
Stated purpose: 10 · 10,21 · 15
Stated purpose: 14 · 13,15 · 5
Stated purpose: 10 · 5,10,20,21 · 10,13
Stated purpose: 5 · 10 · 10,15
Stated purpose: 15 · 5 · 5,10,12,13,15,22
Stated purpose: 10 · 5 · 12
Stated purpose: 12,13
Stated purpose: 10 · 13,15 · 15
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
47 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Save The Children Federation Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $29M · revenue +21%- WAWATERAID AMERICA INC7× · 2019–2025 · $13M · revenue +26%
- MCMercy Corps8× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +19%
Funded once
- SFSRD FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.6M · revenue +28%
- EIENGENDERHEALTH INCone grant, 2017 · $987k · revenue -29%
- AAAbt Associates Incone grant, 2017 · $637k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.
Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Three Seed Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds WATERAID AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds DEVWORKS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND ↗
- Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SRD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC ↗
- Who funds DEEP SOUTH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ↗
- Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BETHELS HEAVENLY HANDS ↗
- Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Family Health International Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Johns Hopkins University · International Initiative for Impact Evaluation Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Adventist Development & Relief Agency International — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- International Youth Foundation — 17% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.