· Private foundation
Family Alliance Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $454,084 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $504,084 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $220k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $217k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $116,500 |
| CAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CHICAGO ABORTION FUND | $30,000 |
| CARA PROGRAM | $30,000 |
| DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $30,000 |
| JTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION | $30,000 |
| POSSE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $20,000 |
| PEACE OF HEART COMMUNITY INC. | $7,584 |
| FOOD RESEARCH AND ACTION CENTER | $5,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DMDYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2023 · $812k · revenue +33%
- TPTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $180k · revenue +49%
- TCThe Cara Program6× · 2017–2023 · $180k · revenue +116%
Funded once
- VRVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +43%
- CNCAMP NEBAGAMONone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -22%
- BBEAMone grant, 2020 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voter Registration Project and the most unlike its peers is Camp Nebagamon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Cara Program ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP NEBAGAMON ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds ARCADIA FOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
- Who funds JTP PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds PINE CASTLE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds CURT'S CAFE ↗
- Who funds EDENS COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Food Research & Action Center ↗
- Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PEACE OF HEART COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE TANGANYIKA FLOATING HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HALCYON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds WARRICK DUNN CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds WJCT INC ↗
- Who funds DREAMS COME TRUE OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Kellcie Fund · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Family Alliance Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- North Florida Land Trust Inc — 81% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pine Castle Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.