Skip to content

· Public charity

Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

$7.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
143
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$43MCommunity Improvement$957kHealth$192kHuman Services$62kHousing & Shelter$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kEmployment$20kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 143 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 143 grants below total $6,772,854, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,045,580 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $272,726 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $155k
  • $10k–50k89 grants · $2.0M
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.3M
$20,618
Median grant
27
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARTAN STORES LLC$1,787,228
GLORY SUPERMARKET OUTER DRIVE$288,829
GLORY SUPERMARKET OAK PARK$265,314
GLORY SUPERMARKET HIGHLAND PARK$243,274
PARKWAY FOODS$164,535
EASTERN MARKET CORPORATION$150,000
DAMIANS CRAFT MEATS LLC$147,000
PICK & SAVE SUPERMARKET$115,387
TOWN & COUNTRY SUPERMARKET$100,110
UNIVERSITY FOODS$96,423
E&L SUPERMERCADO$91,308
PARK STREET MARKET$86,570
FOOD FARM MARKET$80,636
GREAT GIANT SUPERMARKET SAGINAW$79,248
MINNEAPOLIS MARRIOTT CITY CENTER$65,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $376k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN GREENWORKS: $25k → 15%KC HEALTHY KIDS (VENDOR): $25k → 16%TOGETHER WE CAN - VEGAS ROOTS: $20k → 13%IN ADVANCE: $50k → 10%TOGETHER WE CAN VEGAS ROOTS: $20k → 13%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS: $34k → 12%SOUTH LANSING COMM DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 16%NEW BALTIMORE FARMERS MARKET: $5k → 10%SOUTH LANSING COMM DEVELOPMENT: $6k → 16%SOUTH LANSING COMM DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $15k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $14k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CTR: $12k → 16%UNITED CHURCH OUTREACH MINISTRY: $8k → 11%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $11k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $10k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $8k → 16%UNITED CHURCH OUTREACH MINISTRY: $7k → 11%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $6k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $27k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $20k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $13k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $8k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $7k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $6k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER GRAND RAPIDS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 138 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

138 repeat relationships: 68 still active in FY2024, 70 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

138
131

Total granted

$39M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+32%

Still filing today

28%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EASTERN MARKET CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +7%
  • FIELD & FORK NETWORK
    6× · 2017–2024 · $853k · revenue +397% · 42% of their budget
  • NC
    NOURISH COLORADO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $549k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • SS
    SPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200k · revenue -13%
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $135k
  • CO
    CITY OF BOSTON
    one grant, 2019 · $105k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Local Food Network

To increase the consumption of and production of organically grown produce in our local region by supporting farms via events and markets where they can connect with new customers. additionally create and participate in educational…

Food & Nutrition
2
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
3
Fondy Food Center Inc

He fondy food center connects greater milwaukee to local, fresh food- from farm to market to table - so that children learn better, adults live healthier, and communities celebrate cultural food traditions.

Food & Nutrition
4
Coastal Foodshed

A public health initiative working to make healthy local foods more available, more accessible, and more familiar by connecting local growers with local consumers as well as providing education around local food, nutrition, and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Broad River Community Market

To create a thriving, equitable food system by working with local farms to provide crucial access to fresh produce to food insecure people in Cleveland County.

Food & Nutrition
6
Hub City Roots

The hub city farmers' market is a nonprofit community organization that aims to increase supply, demand, and access to healthy, local foods in spartanburg, south carolina.

Food & Nutrition
7
Saba Grocers Initiative

A healthy community where everyone has access to quality, nutritious, healthy food can be achieved through a synergistic relationship between stores and the communities they serve. Corner stores/community markets can serve as an important…

Food & Nutrition
8
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food to cultivate community and alleviate hunger. through community food access, agriculture, education, and strategic partnerships, we work toward a…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Works

Food Works is a non-profit organization dedicated to creating a sustainable food economy in Southern Illinois. Through farmer training and consumer education, Food Works promotes long-term farming networks that create healthy soils,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

—
11
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Uptown Farmers Market

Our mission is to engage our neighbors around locally grown, fresh foods to support local farmers and food artisans, educate on healthy eating, and eliminate food insecurity in our charlotte community.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luella Hannan Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

151 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 151 of the 344 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
144/151
Grantees still filing
101/151
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPARTAN STORES LLC: $10,974,188 · OtherSPARTAN STORES LLCE&L SUPERMERCADO: $1,763,969 · OtherGLORY SUPERMARKET OUTER DRIVE: $1,671,689 · Other+120 more: $21,633,147 · Other+120 moreEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $1,020,022 · Food & NutritionFULTON STREET FARMERS MARKET INC: $487,634 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $136,964 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $112,200 · Food & NutritionFRESHFARM MARKETS: $111,737 · Food & NutritionWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $109,950 · Food & Nutrition+26 more: $1,075,105 · Food & NutritionNOURISH COLORADO: $549,361 · HealthJACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION: $356,550 · HealthKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $56,917 · HealthNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $53,000 · HealthPARKVIEW HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $49,960 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $49,863 · Health+9 more: $324,599 · HealthUPTOWN REINVESTMENT CORPORATION: $562,448 · Community ImprovementMIDLAND BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $180,000 · Community ImprovementMandela Partners Prev Mandela Marketplace Inc: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $50,000 · Community ImprovementWEBB CITY FARMERS MARKET: $49,511 · Community ImprovementTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $36,828 · Community Improvement+2 more: $52,823 · Community ImprovementThe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019): $86,969 · Human ServicesAllen Neighborhood Center: $76,000 · Human ServicesINADVANCE: $50,000 · Human ServicesTogether We can: $40,000 · Human ServicesJANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $33,817 · Human ServicesIDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesKC Healthy Kids: $25,000 · Human ServicesVIRGIN ISLANDS GOOD FOOD COALITION: $25,000 · Human ServicesQUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC: $24,860 · Human ServicesURBAN GREENWORKS INC: $24,750 · Human ServicesJAMES C ACHESON FOUNDATION: $141,754 · PhilanthropyBETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $46,890 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCREIGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $24,059 · PhilanthropySOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $23,167 · PhilanthropyCITY GREEN INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentUrban Harvest Inc: $49,830 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF ZENGER FARM: $39,280 · EnvironmentAppalachian Resource Conservation & Development Council: $34,326 · EnvironmentTHE FOOD MILL: $25,000 · EnvironmentROYTENS ENRICHMENT ACADEMY COMMUNITY HOPE: $24,950 · Environment
Other$36,042,993Food & Nutrition$3,053,612Health$1,490,250Community Improvement$981,610Human Services$411,396Philanthropy$265,870Environment$248,386

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION: $1,020,022 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetFIELD & FORK NETWORK: $853,023 over 6y, 42% of budgetUPTOWN REINVESTMENT CORPORATION: $562,448 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetNOURISH COLORADO: $549,361 over 8y, 11% of budgetFULTON STREET FARMERS MARKET INC: $487,634 over 7y, 82% of budgetJACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION: $356,550 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSPUR - SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PLANNING AND URBAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $200,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMIDLAND BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $180,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetJAMES C ACHESON FOUNDATION: $141,754 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN SAGINAW FARMERS MARKET: $140,436 over 7y, 47% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $136,964 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGROWING HOPE INC: $112,666 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $112,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRESHFARM MARKETS: $111,737 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $109,950 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019): $86,969 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFarmers Market Fund: $80,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAllen Neighborhood Center: $76,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCITY GREEN INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCITY MARKET INC: $74,596 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $68,721 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HOME FARMER'S MARKET INC: $61,050 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $60,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF THE CITY FARMERS MARKET: $60,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTHE FOOD TRUST: $59,784 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWest Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc: $58,913 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTHE LAND CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC: $56,987 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $56,917 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $53,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $51,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPINNACLE PREVENTION CORP: $50,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION OF VERMONT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEVERYONES HARVEST: $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetINADVANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLIVEWELL GREENVILLE: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPACIFIC HEALTH RESEARCH & EDUCATION INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPARKVIEW HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMandela Partners Prev Mandela Marketplace Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABOUT FRESH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $49,960 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $49,863 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING HELPERS INC: $49,832 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetUrban Harvest Inc: $49,830 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetIOWA HEALTHIEST STATE INITIATIVE: $48,802 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $47,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: $46,890 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPARKVIEW HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $45,964 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EASTERN MARKET CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FIELD & FORK NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UPTOWN REINVESTMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds FULTON STREET FARMERS MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

UNFI FoundationRI30.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: UNFI Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · Wholesome Wave Inc · Clif Family Foundation · The Reinvestment Fund Inc · Farm Aid Inc · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Capital Impact Partners · Institute for Responsive Government Inc · Americana Foundation · Third Sector New England Inc · Center for Science in the Public Interest

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fair Food Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fair Food Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Oregon Community Food System Network: 100% of income from government
  • Farmers Market Fund: 100% of income from government
  • City Green Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Quincy Asian Resources Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Feeding Florida Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont: 31% of income from government
  • Friends of Zenger Farm: 28% of income from government
  • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Lahey Clinic Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fair Food Network Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fair Food Network Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 344 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fair Food Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph