Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Americana Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$647k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Arts & Culture$1.3MEducation$1.1MEnvironment$1.0MFood & Nutrition$710kHuman Services$151kCommunity Improvement$142kPhilanthropy$84kPublic Benefit$79kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $495k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$130,000
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$32,000
ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$30,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST MICHIGAN$30,000
FAIR FOOD NETWORK$25,000
HURON PINES$25,000
CONCORD ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY$25,000
FRESHWATER FUTURE$25,000
CLINTON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL$25,000
VALLEY FORGE PARK ALLIANCE$25,000
GROWING HOPE INC$25,000
MUSKEGON RIVER WATERSHED ASSEMBLY$25,000
CITIZENS FOR A SAFE AND CLEAN LAKE SUPERIOR$25,000
MAKE FOOD NOT WASTE$25,000
JAMESTOWN REDISCOVERY FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
DE
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 39 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
74

Total granted

$3.2M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+42%

Still filing today

72%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GROWING HOPE INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $122k · revenue +72%
  • EM
    EASTERN MARKET CORPORATION
    3× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +41%
  • TG
    THE GREENING OF DETROIT
    4× · 2018–2022 · $104k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOUSE OF BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
3
Michigan Historic Preservation Network

Advocate for michigan's historic resources to contribute to the economic vitality, sense of place and connection to the past.

—
4
The Dahlem Conservancy

The mission of the dahlem conservancy is to provide environmental education and outdoor experiences to the people of south central michigan.

Environment
5
Michigan Water Environment Association

Be and create stewards for the water environment of michigan. provide high quality education for michigan's water professionals. educate and inform policy makers and the general public. promote scientifically sound environmental practices…

Environment
6
East Michigan Environmental Action Council Inc

To protect and restore land, air, water, and diversity of life through informed personal and public action.

Environment
7
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
8
Heart of the Lakes Ctr for Land Cons

Heart of the Lakes provides technical assistance, leadership training, and strategic communication tools that help organizations thrive - from grassroots land conservancies to larger regional conservation groups. Programs such as peer…

Environment
9
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Southeast Michigan Land Conservancy

To conserve natural land and open space - including forests, wetlands, meadows, agricultural lands, and places of scenic beauty - to provide habitat for wildlife and to enrich the lives of people.

Environment
11
Mid-Michigan Land Conservancy

To protect natural, scenic, recreational, and agricultural lands and their natural diversity in mid-michigan so rural landscapes are preserved, and to promote the protection of these lands and their natural diversity through education and…

Environment
12
Michigan State Trust for Railway Pr

To preserve the knowledge, skills and technology involved with the maintenance and operation of steam locomotives and to educate the public about the enormous impact that these machines had in the economic development of owosso and the…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legacy Land Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Edsel & Eleanor Ford House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsLocal History MuseumsCommunity Arts CentersSchool District FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr13%10%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr18%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%6%5–10yr20%37%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr18%13%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/99
the rest of the field
12%
6,510/53,757

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/93
Grantees still filing
62/93
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $913,992 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYHISTORIC NEW ENGLAND — $138,800 · OtherHISTORIC NEW ENGLAND+49 more — $996,115 · Other+49 moreTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 · Arts & CultureTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDA…Colonial Williamsburg Foundation — $99,184 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg F…OLD STURBRIDGE INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureOLD STURBRIDGE INCHENRY FORD ESTATE — $72,500 · Arts & CultureHENRY FORD ESTATEDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA — $55,549 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIAPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $50,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN HISTORY FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Arts & CultureHESSEL SCHOOL HOUSE CORPORATION — $39,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more — $390,840 · Arts & Culture+19 moreTHE GREENING OF DETROIT — $104,000 · EnvironmentTHE GREENING OF DET…ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $90,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LAW A…MICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL — $68,000 · EnvironmentMICHIGAN ENVIROMENT…LEGACY LAND CONSERVANCY — $40,900 · EnvironmentSAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE — $40,000 · EnvironmentSIX RIVERS LAND CONSERVANCY FKA SIX RIVERS REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $36,599 · EnvironmentSOUTHWEST DETROIT ENVIRONMENTAL VISION — $30,000 · EnvironmentKEWEENAW LAND TRUST INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $30,000 · Environment+20 more — $373,650 · Environment+20 moreEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION — $105,000 · Food & NutritionEASTERN M…MAKE FOOD NOT WASTE — $63,514 · Food & NutritionMAKE FOOD…EDIBLE FLINT — $50,000 · Food & NutritionEDIBLE FL…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $45,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN…OUR KITCHEN TABLE — $30,000 · Food & NutritionOUR KITCH…FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $27,488 · Food & NutritionFAIR FOOD…CARES OF FARMINGTON HILLS INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionCARES OF …Soil2Service Inc — $20,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST — $18,500 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $18,500 · Food & NutritionASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $96,000 · Community ImprovementKEEP GROWING DETROIT — $94,000 · Community ImprovementDetroit Future City — $25,000 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET CALUMET INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementMACKINAC ASSOCIATES — $10,000 · Community ImprovementEARTH University Foundation Inc — $185,000 · InternationalGROWING HOPE INC — $122,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$2,048,907Arts & Culture$982,073Environment$843,149Food & Nutrition$403,002Community Improvement$240,000International$185,000Youth Development$124,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEARTH University Foundation Inc — $185,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGROWING HOPE INC — $122,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetEASTERN MARKET CORPORATION — $105,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT — $104,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $99,184 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $96,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetKEEP GROWING DETROIT — $94,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST — $90,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHENRY FORD ESTATE — $72,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMICHIGAN ENVIROMENTAL COUNCIL — $68,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMAKE FOOD NOT WASTE — $63,514 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA — $55,549 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEDSEL & ELEANOR FORD HOUSE — $51,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEDIBLE FLINT — $50,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST MICHIGAN — $50,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HISTORY FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetLEGACY LAND CONSERVANCY — $40,900 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSAUGATUCK DUNES COASTAL ALLIANCE — $40,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetHESSEL SCHOOL HOUSE CORPORATION — $39,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSIX RIVERS LAND CONSERVANCY FKA SIX RIVERS REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $36,599 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN — $35,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST DETROIT ENVIRONMENTAL VISION — $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOUR KITCHEN TABLE — $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWORCESTER ART MUSEUM — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPACKARD MOTOR CAR FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC — $27,488 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER — $27,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCitizens for a Safe & Clean Lake Superior — $25,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetMUSKEGON RIVER WATERSHED ASSEMBLY — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHistorical Society of Michigan — $25,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJAMESTOWN REDISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCARES OF FARMINGTON HILLS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHURON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBlack to the Land Coalition — $25,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetSOO LOCKS CHILDRENS MUSEUM — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHISTORIC LOCUST GROVE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetDetroit Future City — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGreat Lakes Aquatic Habitat Network and Fund Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCONCORD ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY D/B/A CONCORD MUSEUM — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHISTORIC DEERFIELD INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHURON PINES RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dte Energy FoundationCommunity Foundation …The Fred & Barbara Er…Charles Stewart Mott …Consumers Energy Foun…WK Kellogg FoundationHarry a and Margaret …The Kresge FoundationMichigan Health Endow…Ford PhilanthropyUnited Way for Southe…Frey Foundation
Dte Energy FoundationMI46.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dte Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Ford Philanthropy · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Frey Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Americana Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Concord Antiquarian Society D/B/a Concord Museum — 1% of income from government
  • Worcester Art Museum — 1% of income from government
  • Historic Deerfield Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Americana Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Americana Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines