Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Wholesome Wave Inc

Wholesome wave, inc.

$417k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.7MHealth$249kEnvironment$35kCommunity Improvement$25kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $265k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$912k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABOUT FRESH$169,696
HISPANIC HEALTH COUNCIL$95,750
THE CORBIN HILL FOOD PROJECT INC$20,000
BUFFALO GO GREEN INC$20,000
LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER$20,000
HMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION$20,000
SICANGU COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$10,000
MELTING POT FOUNDATION USA INC$10,000
GREEN RURAL REDEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION$10,000
SANKOFA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$10,000
ALAMEDIA COUNTY RECIPE4HEALTH$10,000
HEBNI NUTRITION CONSULTANTS INC$10,000
INDIGEHUB$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $88k → 20%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $76k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $58k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 30 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
39

Total granted

$2.8M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+48%

Still filing today

83%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Food & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    Maine Farmland Trust
    2× · 2017–2018 · $292k · revenue +134%
  • SE
    SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES OF LA DBA FOOD ACCESS LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $212k · revenue +438%
  • PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $164k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • CS
    C-TOWN SUPERMARKET
    one grant, 2020 · $106k
  • TC
    THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $88k · revenue +186%
  • TC
    TARGET CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
2
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
3
Coastal Foodshed

A public health initiative working to make healthy local foods more available, more accessible, and more familiar by connecting local growers with local consumers as well as providing education around local food, nutrition, and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Food Connections Inc

Support small farms and other businesses. Bring sustainable healthy products to the community.

Food & Nutrition
6
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Farmers Market Fund

Helping under-served populations in oregon with greater access to healthy, locally grown food.

Food & Nutrition
8
Portland Farmers Market

Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…

Community Improvement
9
Heart of the City Farmers Market

The organization operates a certified farmers market in san francisco to address food insercurity and support local small-scale agriculture, provides nutrition education outreach, and distributes over 1 million annually in food assistance…

—
10
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
11
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
12
Uptown Farmers Market

Our mission is to engage our neighbors around locally grown, fresh foods to support local farmers and food artisans, educate on healthy eating, and eliminate food insecurity in our charlotte community.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Center for Community Life and the most unlike its peers is Ohio State University Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAsian American Advocacy & H…Native Hawaiian Community D…Food Pantries & AssistanceAt-Risk Youth MentoringEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Public University Foundatio…Community Health CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%47%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%42%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
4/76
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,489

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/57
Grantees still filing
40/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Maine Farmland Trust — $292,168 · Food & NutritionMaine Farmland TrustHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC — $173,911 · Food & NutritionHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INCABOUT FRESH INC — $169,696 · Food & NutritionABOUT FRESH INCLOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURE PROJECT LEAP — $162,577 · Food & NutritionLOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURE PROJECT LEA…FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $139,835 · Food & NutritionFARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INCWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC — $102,224 · Food & NutritionWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INCVERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INC — $94,380 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INCFONDY FOOD CENTER INC — $83,697 · Food & NutritionFONDY FOOD CENTER INCHMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION — $60,000 · Food & NutritionTHE CORBIN HILL FOOD PROJECT INC — $60,000 · Food & NutritionLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $60,000 · Food & Nutrition+10 more — $162,431 · Food & Nutrition+10 morePRODUCE PERKS MIDWEST INC — $140,338 · OtherPRODUCE PERKS MIDWEST INCC-TOWN SUPERMARKET — $105,885 · OtherC-TOWN SUPERMARKETCOMMUNITY FOODWORKS — $90,830 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOODWORKSDAVE'S SUPERMARKET — $83,585 · OtherDAVE'S SUPERMARKETGEORGE WASHINGTON REGIONAL COMMISSION — $67,544 · OtherGEORGE WASHINGTON REGIONAL COMMIS…TARGET CORPORATION — $65,279 · OtherTARGET CORPORATIONOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $53,171 · OtherEND HUNGER CT — $53,039 · OtherCHURCH CHARITABLE FOUNDATION OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF LOS ANGELES — $42,500 · OtherEND HUNGER CONNECTICUT INC — $49,242 · OtherWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $45,000 · Other+25 more — $405,085 · Other+25 morePEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $164,400 · HealthPEDIATRIC AND…HISPANIC HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $155,206 · HealthHISPANIC HEAL…SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $55,200 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO…KOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES — $42,828 · HealthKOKUA KALIHI …Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc — $32,000 · HealthJessie Trice …ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · Health+2 more — $14,130 · HealthSUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES OF LA DBA FOOD ACCESS LOS ANGELES — $212,050 · Community ImprovementSID PUBLIC SERVICES ASSOCIATION — $22,400 · Community ImprovementWEBB CITY FARMERS MARKET — $17,004 · Community ImprovementAPPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT — $16,535 · Community ImprovementSicangu Community Development Corporation — $10,000 · Community ImprovementGREEN RURAL REDEVELOPMENT INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $133,980 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC — $88,300 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION OF VERMONT — $147,100 · Arts & CultureSANKOFA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBUFFALO GO GREEN INC — $60,000 · EducationHEIRLOOM FARMERS MARKETS INC — $57,382 · Education
Food & Nutrition$1,560,919Other$1,201,498Health$481,764Community Improvement$287,989Human Services$222,280Arts & Culture$157,100Education$117,382

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMaine Farmland Trust — $292,168 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES OF LA DBA FOOD ACCESS LOS ANGELES — $212,050 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetHARTFORD FOOD SYSTEM INC — $173,911 over 3y, 13% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH — $164,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGRICULTURE PROJECT LEAP — $162,577 over 2y, 17% of budgetHISPANIC HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $155,206 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION OF VERMONT — $147,100 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetPRODUCE PERKS MIDWEST INC — $140,338 over 2y, 20% of budgetFARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $139,835 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $133,980 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC — $102,224 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetVERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INC — $94,380 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOODWORKS — $90,830 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC — $88,300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFONDY FOOD CENTER INC — $83,697 over 2y, 14% of budgetBUFFALO GO GREEN INC — $60,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHMONG AMERICAN FARMERS ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CORBIN HILL FOOD PROJECT INC — $60,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHEIRLOOM FARMERS MARKETS INC — $57,382 over 2y, 13% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $55,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $53,171 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEND HUNGER CONNECTICUT INC — $49,242 over 1y, 11% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $45,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES — $42,828 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN UMBRELLA — $34,573 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetJessie Trice Community Health System Inc — $32,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMemorial Hermann Community Benefit Corporation — $32,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRESH APPROACH — $24,916 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFarmers Market Of The Ozarks Inc — $23,368 over 2y, 10% of budgetFLORIDA CERTIFIED ORGANIC GROWERS AND CONSUMERS INC — $22,788 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMARYLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOCIATION — $22,724 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMEMPHIS TILTH — $22,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSID PUBLIC SERVICES ASSOCIATION — $22,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $18,830 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAPPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT — $16,535 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR FOOD — $14,021 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFRESHFARM MARKETS — $13,603 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMELTING POT FOUNDATION USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHEBNI NUTRITION CONSULTANTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSANKOFA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSicangu Community Development Corporation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREEN RURAL REDEVELOPMENT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARCADIA FOOD INC — $9,240 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetURBAN OASIS PROJECT INC — $7,645 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fair Food Network IncFarm Aid IncAmerican Heart Associ…Share Our StrengthThe Reinvestment Fund…Clif Family FoundationUNFI FoundationNational League of Ci…The Rockefeller Found…National Foundation f…The Conservation Fund…Henry P Kendall Found…
Fair Food Network IncMI29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fair Food Network Inc · Farm Aid Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Share Our Strength · The Reinvestment Fund Inc · Clif Family Foundation · UNFI Foundation · National League of Cities Institute Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Henry P Kendall Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wholesome Wave Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont — 31% of income from government
  • Friends of Zenger Farm — 28% of income from government
  • Jessie Trice Community Health System Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Urban Oasis Project Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Vermont Farm-to-School Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home