Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ezulwini Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$243k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$65k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

69% of Ezulwini Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Wet Mtn Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Ezulwini Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $243k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
18
17
19
8
20
11
21
9
22
9
23
9
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$680kPhilanthropy$630kInternational$210kHuman Services$85kEducation$83kCommunity Improvement$70kArts & Culture$43kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WET MOUNTAIN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$65,000
ROBERTO CLEMENTE-SANTA ANA HEALTH CLINIC INC$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION-DENVER CAMPUS$25,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT$20,000
SMILE TRAIN INC$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC$20,000
PARTNERS FOR RURAL IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN$10,000
AEROANGEL INCORPORATED$10,000
LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION$10,000
REACH OUT AND READ COLORADO$5,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY$5,000
HIGH MOUNTAIN HAY FEVER FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION: $10k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $5k → 12%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION: $5k → 12%THERE WITH CARE: $5k → 12%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION: $10k → 12%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION: $5k → 12%LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
UT
CO
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 19 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$1.0M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+44%

Still filing today

68%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $210k · revenue +125%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +18%
  • TR
    THE ROBERTO CLEMENTE SANTA ANA HEALTH CLINIC INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $104k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IE
    individuals experiencing emergency hardship
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • CC
    CUSTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONSOLIDATE 1
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • CF
    COBALT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
2
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
6
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
7
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
8
Poudre Valley Medical Group Llc

We improve lives. in big ways through learning, healing and discovery. in small, personal ways through human connection. but in all ways, we improve lives.

Health
9
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
10
Clinica Campesina Family Health Services

Clinica's mission is to be the medical, dental, and behavioral health care provider of choice for low income and other underserved people in in south boulder, broomfield, gilpin, and west adams counties. (continued on schedule o)our care…

Health
11
Clinica Colorado

To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.

Health
12
Colorado Digital Health

Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains Service Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Public University Foundatio…Community Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Land Conservation Organizat…Elementary Literacy TutoringAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr21%21%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%8%10–20yr17%70%20–35yr12%4%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,388

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $630,000 · PhilanthropyWET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSMILE TRAIN INC — $105,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION-DENVER CAMPUS — $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATI…PARTNERS FOR RURAL IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN ETHIOPIA — $70,000 · OtherPARTNERS FOR RURAL IMPROVEMENT …UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT — $40,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA IN…individuals experiencing emergency hardship — $40,000 · Otherindividuals experiencing emerge…LOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION — $30,000 · OtherLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY A NOT FOR…CUSTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONSOLIDATE 1 — $25,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS SERVICE CORPORATION — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $50,500 · Other+7 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $210,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARC…THE ROBERTO CLEMENTE SANTA ANA HEALTH CLINIC INC — $104,000 · HealthTHE ROBERTO CLEMENTE SANTA…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $40,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PAR…The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy — $30,000 · HealthThe Foundation for Periphe…+5 more — $35,000 · Health+5 moreFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 · InternationalFABRETTO …+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $45,000 · EducationLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY — $35,000 · Human ServicesTHERE WITH CARE — $10,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF FREMONTCOUNTY INC — $12,500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $2,500 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife — $1,000 · AnimalsWILD HORSE OUTREACH & ADVOCACY — $1,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$630,000Other$505,500Health$419,000International$160,000Education$45,000Human Services$45,000Animals$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWET MTN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $630,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $210,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $105,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROBERTO CLEMENTE SANTA ANA HEALTH CLINIC INC — $104,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY — $35,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy — $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF FREMONTCOUNTY INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ COLORADO — $12,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN HAY FEVER FESTIVAL — $11,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetAEROANGEL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOBALT FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAHA GLOBAL INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ezulwini Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph