Skip to content

· Private foundation

Everett & Joyce Van Der Molen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$212kYouth Development$94kHealth$85kInternational$54kEducation$47kArts & Culture$27kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUTREACH MINISTRIES$10,000
KID'S ALIVE$8,000
MARKLUND$8,000
ROSELAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$7,000
LOVE Christian Clearinghouse Inc$6,000
Boulevard Presbyterian Church$6,000
DONKA$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,500
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$5,000
Breakthrough Urban Ministries$5,000
Young Men's Educational Network$5,000
OPPORTUNITY INTL$5,000
CHICAGO WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN SCH$4,000
ELIM CHRISTIAN Services$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARKLUND: $8k → 8%MARKLUND: $8k → 8%MARKLUND: $8k → 8%MARKLUND: $8k → 8%MARKLUND: $8k → 8%MARKLUND: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
IN
CA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$587k · 34 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
1

Total granted

$587k
$500

Still filing today

41%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +36%
  • DI
    DONKA INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +17%
  • BU
    BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIGHPOINT CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
2
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
Midwest Challenge Inc

Sharing the gospel while providing hope and transformation.

Health
6
Every Generation Ministries Inc

Every generation minstries is an international, interdenominational, christian organization which ministers together with local churches to develop effective ministry to children and families. the organization strives to equip overseas…

Religion
7
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
8
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
9
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
10
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
11
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
12
Peacemaker Ministries

To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Art On Sedgwick. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $60,000 · OtherOUTREACH MINISTRIESKID'S ALIVE: $43,000 · OtherKID'S ALIVEDONKA INCORPORATED: $36,500 · OtherDONKA INCORPORATEDROSELAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $33,000 · OtherROSELAND CHRISTIAN MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $30,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $30,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCLOVE INC: $30,000 · OtherLOVE INCBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $24,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INCCHICAGO WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN SCH: $23,500 · OtherCHICAGO WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · Other+17 more: $84,500 · Other+17 moreCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen: $33,500 · EducationCornerstone …Young Mens Educational Network: $21,000 · EducationYoung Mens E…ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $13,000 · EducationELIM CHRISTI…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $24,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNIT…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $9,500 · InternationalFEED MY ST…Mercy Ships International: $9,000 · InternationalMercy Ship…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $6,500 · InternationalINTERNATIO…WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $5,500 · InternationalWATER MISS…MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME: $48,000 · Human ServicesMARKLUND …ART ON SEDGWICK: $8,500 · Arts & CultureSCARCE: $7,000 · EnvironmentEmmaus Ministries: $2,000 · Religion
Other$413,000Education$67,500International$54,500Human Services$48,000Arts & Culture$8,500Environment$7,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME: $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDONKA INCORPORATED: $36,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen: $33,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Mens Educational Network: $21,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetART ON SEDGWICK: $8,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSCARCE: $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmmaus Ministries: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds DONKA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone Academy co Richard Van der Molen ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Educational Network ↗
  • Who funds ELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds ART ON SEDGWICK ↗
  • Who funds SCARCE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Emmaus Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Kehe Cares Foundation Inc · The Service Club of Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Everett & Joyce Van Der Molen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everett & Joyce Van Der Molen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Everett & Joyce Van Der Molen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Everett & Joyce Van Der Molen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Everett & Joyce Van Der Molen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph