Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$704k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
22
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,821
Largest grant, FY2025
$316,419
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman Services
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving22$704k86%
FY20241$18k100%
FY20232$29k0%
FY20222$32k0%
FY20213$28k33%
FY20202$26k0%
FY20192$27kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$432kHealth$111kHuman Services$110kReligion$70kFood & Nutrition$62kArts & Culture$16kAnimals$16kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($247k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVMI Foundation: $334,395 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMeals on Wheels Inc of Tarrant County: $46,216 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGuardianship Services Inc: $30,821 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Woman's Club of Fort Worth Inc: $16,243 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Fort Worth Zoological Association: $15,821 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrevent Blindness Texas: $15,821 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSafehaven of Tarrant County: $15,821 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Fort Worth Inc: $15,821 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Cumberland Rest Inc: $15,821 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Multiple Sclerosis Society: $15,821 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels: $15,821 over 1y, 11% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Morris Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust

How much does Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust give?
Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust reported 22 grants totaling $703,576 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (50%), Health (13%), Human Services (13%).
Who are Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: VMI Foundation ($334k), Meals on Wheels Inc of Tarrant County ($46k), Guardianship Services Inc ($31k).
Does Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Communities Foundation of Texas Inc, Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc, Sid W Richardson Foundation.
Where is Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust based?
Everett & Edith Comer Charitable Trust is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Everett & Edith Comer’s filings →

More from the funding graph