Skip to content
Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$105kRecreation & Sports$80kEducation$73kFood & Nutrition$55kHousing & Shelter$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kAnimals$25kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$26,063
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORENO VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST$26,063
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $15k → 14%THE FOOD DEPOT: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
NV
PA
CA
CO
NM
AR
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 4% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 12%.

Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
3
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Northwest Louisiana Food Bank

Nw la food bank's mission is to be the primary resource for fighting hunger in northwest louisiana.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
6
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of the Rockies

Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
9
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
10
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
11
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Food Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Education for Sharing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
14/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPORTS FOR SHARING INC: $80,000 · OtherSPORTS FOR SHARING INCChildren FirstCommunities In Schools of Buncombe County Inc: $30,000 · OtherChildren FirstCommunities In Schools of Buncombe County…MORENO VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRIST: $26,063 · OtherMORENO VALLEY CHURCH OF CHRISTANGEL FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $14,498 · OtherANGEL FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENTHEART OF TAOS: $9,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · Other+13 more: $68,227 · Other+13 moreEDUCATION FOR SHARING INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentEDUCATION FOR SHARING I…Working on Wellness Inc: $43,075 · EducationWorking on…COLORADO RIVER FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionRodale Institute: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD & WATER WATCH: $5,000 · Food & NutritionMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionEmergencyRV Inc: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPartnership With Native Americans: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLUE MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsXERCES SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$237,788Youth Development$100,000Education$43,075Food & Nutrition$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Human Services$25,000Animals$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDUCATION FOR SHARING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetChildren FirstCommunities In Schools of Buncombe County Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPartnership With Native Americans: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF TAOS: $9,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL VETERANS WELLNESS AND HEALING CENTER IN ANGEL FIRE INC: $7,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTaos Coalition To End Homelessness Inc: $6,935 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO RIVER FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRodale Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget350ORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Feeding AmericaCharities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Feeding AmericaIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Feeding America · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eugene Martin Charitable Trust Dba Eugene & Dorothy Martin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home