Skip to content
Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
274
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$10MCivil Rights$10MCrime & Legal$7.7MPhilanthropy$6.8MYouth Development$5.9MPublic Benefit$4.1MHousing & Shelter$3.8MHuman Services$3.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 274 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k71 grants · $355k
  • $10k–50k88 grants · $2.3M
  • $50k–250k110 grants · $9.4M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.6M
$35,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$231M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DC JUSTICE LAB$375,000
UPTOGETHER$333,400
AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER$300,000
DREAMING OUT LOUD$300,000
BLACK SWAN ACADEMY$250,000
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$225,000
DREAMING OUT LOUD$200,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$175,000
BLACK CHURCH FOOD SECURITY NETWORK$175,000
HARRIET'S WILDEST DREAMS$175,000
OUT FOR JUSTICE$175,000
RACIAL JUSTICE NOW$150,000
BLACK SWAN ACADEMY$150,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$150,000
CRITICAL EXPOSURE$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $6.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UPTOGETHER: $333k → 10%UPTOGETHER: $333k → 10%MOTHER'S OUTREACH NETWORK: $85k → 14%UPTOGETHER: $333k → 10%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $83k → 9%UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $75k → 6%UNITED COMMUNITY: $75k → 6%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $75k → 6%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%UNITED COMMUNITY: $75k → 6%UNITED COMMUNITY: $75k → 6%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $65k → 9%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $75k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $75k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $50k → 14%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICE: $50k → 6%CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $100k → 11%CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $100k → 11%CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $100k → 11%CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $100k → 11%CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $50k → 11%CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $50k → 11%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $75k → 11%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 11%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 11%NONPROFIT PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $75k → 11%NONPROFIT PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $75k → 11%NONPROFIT PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $75k → 11%NONPROFIT PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $75k → 11%NONPROFIT PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY: $59k → 11%FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $75k → 14%FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $75k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $75k → 14%FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $75k → 14%FAIR CHANCE: $50k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%THE FESTIVAL CENTER: $85k → 14%FAIR CHANCE: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE SERVICES: $75k → 14%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE SERVICES: $75k → 14%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE SERVICES: $75k → 14%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE SERVICES: $75k → 14%DC ACTION: $80k → 14%DC ACTION: $75k → 14%DC ACTION: $75k → 14%DC ACTION: $75k → 14%DC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $55k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 192 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

192 repeat relationships: 110 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

192
107

Total granted

$53M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+38%

Still filing today

84%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +253% · 35% of their budget
  • DO
    DREAMING OUT LOUD INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +210%
  • II
    IDENTITY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +255%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -23%
  • P
    PROINSPIREgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $128k · revenue +49%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
2
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
3
Volunteer Legal Advocates

To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…

Housing & Shelter
4
Dc Policy Center

The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…

Public Benefit
5
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
6
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
8
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
9
Federal City Council

The mission of the federal city council is to focus the creativity, talent and resources of washington dc's business and civic leaders on washington, dc's biggest challenges and opportunities.

—
10
Opportunity Dc

Opportunity dc's mission is to help the city of washington, dc become a world-class example of effective local governance and a thriving economy. we advocate for legislative and regulatory changes that lower the cost of living for district…

Human Services
11
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
12
Center for Law and Social Policy

Center for law and social policy (clasp) is a national, nonpartisan, anti-poverty nonprofit advancing policy solutions to improve the lives of people with low incomes. we develop practical yet visionary strategies for reducing poverty,…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Weissberg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

274 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 274 of the 331 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

23
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
94
Early backer (in before they grew)
268/274
Grantees still filing
208/274
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDENTITY INC: $1,089,500 · OtherBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $981,570 · Other+104 more: $26,364,375 · Other+104 moreFII - NATIONAL: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesFII - NATION…CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $571,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO DE AP…HUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY: $433,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN SERVIC…CENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $396,000 · Human ServicesCENTREVILLE …Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $387,950 · Human ServicesVirginia Coa…UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $362,500 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMU…COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE SERVICES: $360,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FA…DC ACTION FOR CHILDREN TODAY DC ACT: $336,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY CENTER: $305,000 · Human ServicesPRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTERINC: $297,800 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $294,000 · Human ServicesFestival Center Inc: $281,030 · Human ServicesDC KINCARE ALLIANCE: $256,500 · Human Services+9 more: $1,148,200 · Human Services+9 moreGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,400,280 · PhilanthropyGREATER WA…TIDES FOUNDATION: $752,500 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUN…IMPACT SILVER SPRING: $685,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT SIL…WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC: $455,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON…WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $291,285 · PhilanthropyOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropySERVE YOUR CITY: $200,000 · Philanthropy+7 more: $751,180 · Philanthropy+7 moreSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $1,557,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOO…PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC: $480,500 · EducationPROGRESSIV…PRINCE GEORGES LEADERSHIP ACTION NETWORK INC: $464,000 · EducationPRINCE GEO…VIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $460,000 · EducationVIRGINIA N…First Generation College Bound Inc: $451,000 · EducationFirst Gene…EVERYDAY CANVASSING: $399,000 · EducationEVERYDAY C…EDU-FUTURO: $375,000 · EducationEDU-FUTUROCOALITION FOR DC REPRESENTATION IN CONGRESS EDUCATION FUND: $230,000 · EducationBOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $187,500 · Education+10 more: $1,020,000 · Education+10 moreDC FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $985,000 · Community ImprovementDC FISCAL…ACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $635,000 · Community ImprovementACT FOR A…FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $633,500 · Community ImprovementFUSION PA…EMPOWER DC: $597,500 · Community ImprovementEMPOWER D…LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $425,000 · Community ImprovementLATINO EC…AFRITHRIVE INC: $382,250 · Community ImprovementAFRITHRIV…MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: $300,111 · Community ImprovementMARYLAND …ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $270,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $226,500 · Community ImprovementTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC: $200,000 · Community Improvement+7 more: $585,000 · Community Improvement+7 moreTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $1,668,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $1,243,500 · Youth DevelopmentCritical Exposure Inc: $590,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG PEOPLE FOR PROGRESS INC: $469,500 · Youth Development+4 more: $280,000 · Youth DevelopmentDC JUSTICE LAB: $860,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $587,500 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC: $535,000 · Crime & LegalOUT For JUSTICE INC: $525,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $400,000 · Crime & LegalTZEDEK DC INC: $385,000 · Crime & LegalCAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION: $240,000 · Crime & Legal+7 more: $616,470 · Crime & Legal
Other$28,435,445Human Services$6,428,980Philanthropy$5,785,245Education$5,624,500Community Improvement$5,239,861Youth Development$4,251,000Crime & Legal$4,148,970

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,400,280 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $1,668,000 over 6y, 35% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $1,557,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $1,243,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetIDENTITY INC: $1,089,500 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDC FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $985,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $981,570 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetDC JUSTICE LAB: $860,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $826,500 over 6y, 42% of budgetAdvocates for Justice and Education: $799,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $752,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Commonwealth Institute for: $723,500 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetIMPACT SILVER SPRING: $685,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCASA INC: $645,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $635,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $633,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetEMPOWER DC: $597,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $595,250 over 6y, 14% of budgetCritical Exposure Inc: $590,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $588,500 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $587,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR: $571,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $568,350 over 6y, 13% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC: $535,000 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetOUT For JUSTICE INC: $525,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $519,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCoalition for Nonprofit Housing and: $514,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetTRABAJADORES UNIDOS DE WASHINGTON DC: $514,000 over 6y, 41% of budgetTENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $513,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC: $480,500 over 6y, 17% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $473,250 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON LEGAL CLINIC FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $470,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetYOUNG PEOPLE FOR PROGRESS INC: $469,500 over 5y, 65% of budgetPRINCE GEORGES LEADERSHIP ACTION NETWORK INC: $464,000 over 6y, 50% of budgetVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $460,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetWASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS INC: $455,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetFirst Generation College Bound Inc: $451,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY: $433,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $425,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetACTION IN MONTGOMERY INC: $412,500 over 6y, 15% of budgetHARRIETS WILDEST DREAMS INC: $400,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $400,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetEVERYDAY CANVASSING: $399,000 over 4y, 78% of budgetCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $396,000 over 6y, 23% of budgetFIRST SHIFT JUSTICE PROJECT: $390,000 over 6y, 33% of budgetVirginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $387,950 over 6y, 33% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $386,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC ↗
  • Who funds IDENTITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds DC FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DC JUSTICE LAB ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds Advocates for Justice and Education ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Commonwealth Institute for ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT SILVER SPRING ↗
  • Who funds CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACT FOR ALEXANDRIA ↗
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER DC ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Critical Exposure Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO DE APOYO FAMILIAR ↗
  • Who funds MANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OUT For JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and ↗
  • Who funds TRABAJADORES UNIDOS DE WASHINGTON DC ↗
  • Who funds TENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON LEGAL CLINIC FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG PEOPLE FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCE GEORGES LEADERSHIP ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendo…Greater Washington Co…United Way of the Nat…If FoundationPhilip L Graham Fund …Weissberg FoundationClark-Winchcole Found…Annie E Casey Foundat…Venable Foundation IncClark Charitable Foun…World Bank Community …Diane & Norman Bernst…
The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC190× affinity111 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · If Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Weissberg Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Venable Foundation Inc · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · World Bank Community Connections Fund · Diane & Norman Bernstein Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Afrithrive Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations: 27% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Housing Initiative Partnership Inc: 21% of income from government
  • The Montgomery County Coalition for the Homeless Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc: 17% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Identity Inc: 7% of income from government
  • First Generation College Bound Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Interfaith Works: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 331 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eugene & Agnes E Meyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home