Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$17MArts & Culture$5.0MEnvironment$2.9MHuman Services$298kCivil Rights$234kPhilanthropy$183kCrime & Legal$133kRecreation & Sports$130kHealth$120kOther$13M
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $365k
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.7M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$61M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$1,550,000
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL$1,300,000
SAINT LOUIS ZOO$1,000,000
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY$300,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$300,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$100,000
MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY$95,000
CAMP NEBAGAMON$70,000
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$50,000
CITY ACADEMY$50,000
THE MAGIC HOUSE$35,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$30,000
SAINT LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER$25,000
FRIENDS OF BOSS INC$16,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $5k → 10%PEACE HOUSE: $5k → 5%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 10%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 10%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 10%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $8k → 4%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $7k → 4%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 4%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%LEGAL INFORMATION FOR FAMILIES TODAY: $600 → 20%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 10%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $5k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $20k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $11k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $11k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36M · 108 repeat orgs$658k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

108 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 91 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
49

Total granted

$36M
$658k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+20%

Still filing today

70%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +76%
  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +63%
  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $225k
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF COLLECTIONS
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · 100% of their budget
  • GW
    GIVE WELL MAX IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust and the most unlike its peers is Museum of Collections. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsChristian Youth CampsImmigrant Worker SupportPregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Food PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterJewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …School District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr12%3%5–10yr16%17%10–20yr15%27%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr24%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr16%1%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr16%7%35–55yr24%66%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/121
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,370

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/113
Grantees still filing
78/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $11,042,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,400,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $2,170,000 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL+21 more — $1,228,500 · Education+21 moreBARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL — $7,370,000 · OtherBARNES JEWISH HOSPITALSAINT LOUIS ZOO — $3,085,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS ZOO+83 more — $2,909,500 · Other+83 moreSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,470,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SY…MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $1,070,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEA…MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $672,500 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTO…+18 more — $739,000 · Arts & Culture+18 moreForest Park Forever Inc — $1,400,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $1,120,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $380,000 · Environment+3 more — $37,650 · EnvironmentJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $82,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $50,000 · Human ServicesHER FUTURE COALITION INC — $18,000 · Human ServicesHaight Ashbury Food Program — $14,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $10,000 · Human Services+3 more — $8,600 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $113,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $10,000 · Civil Rights+4 more — $20,500 · Civil RightsUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropySTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $12,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$16,841,000Other$13,364,500Arts & Culture$4,951,500Environment$2,937,650Human Services$297,600Civil Rights$233,500Philanthropy$182,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $11,042,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA — $2,470,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,400,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $2,170,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $1,400,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $1,120,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $1,070,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $672,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $380,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC — $335,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $154,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $145,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP NEBAGAMON — $130,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $113,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF COLLECTIONS — $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD PLAYHOUSE INC — $100,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $100,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $95,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $82,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL — $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS — $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWebster University — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond Differences — $65,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $57,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL — $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT — $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE SALUD — $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL — $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRanken Technical College — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CAMP NEBAGAMON ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF COLLECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGIC HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centene FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…Opa FoundationBerges Family Foundat…The Kranzberg Family …Trio Foundation of St…World Wide Technology…LNS&ARS FoundationPershing Charitable T…Sam and Marilyn Fox F…Regional Cultural and…St Louis Community Fo…
Centene FoundationMO29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centene Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Opa Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · World Wide Technology Foundation · LNS&ARS Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission · St Louis Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Playhouse Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013?

Find your warmest path to Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines