Skip to content
Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$17MHealth$8.4MArts & Culture$5.3MAnimals$3.1MEnvironment$1.6MRecreation & Sports$1.5MPhilanthropy$235kCivil Rights$225kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $365k
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.7M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$61M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$1,550,000
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL$1,300,000
SAINT LOUIS ZOO$1,000,000
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY$300,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$300,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$100,000
MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY$95,000
CAMP NEBAGAMON$70,000
CITY ACADEMY$50,000
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$50,000
THE MAGIC HOUSE$35,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$30,000
SAINT LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER$25,000
FRIENDS OF BOSS INC$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $5k → 10%PEACE HOUSE: $5k → 5%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 10%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 10%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 4%HAIGHT ASHBURY FOOD PROGRAM: $3k → 10%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $8k → 4%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $7k → 4%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%BLINK NOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 4%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION: $15k → 17%LEGAL INFORMATION FOR FAMILIES TODAY: $600 → 20%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 10%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $5k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $20k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $11k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $11k → 17%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 108 repeat orgs$658k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

108 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 91 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
49

Total granted

$36M
$658k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+20%

Still filing today

70%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +76%
  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +63%
  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $225k
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF COLLECTIONS
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · 100% of their budget
  • GW
    GIVE WELL MAX IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Museum of Collections. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/113
Grantees still filing
78/113
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $11,042,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,400,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $2,170,000 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL+21 more: $1,228,500 · Education+21 moreBARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $7,370,000 · OtherBARNES JEWISH HOSPITALSAINT LOUIS ZOO: $3,085,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS ZOO+83 more: $2,909,500 · Other+83 moreSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,470,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT LOUIS SY…MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $1,070,000 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEA…MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $672,500 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTO…+18 more: $739,000 · Arts & Culture+18 moreForest Park Forever Inc: $1,400,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $1,120,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $380,000 · Environment+3 more: $37,650 · EnvironmentJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $82,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT: $50,000 · Human ServicesHER FUTURE COALITION INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesHaight Ashbury Food Program: $14,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $10,000 · Human Services+3 more: $8,600 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $113,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights+4 more: $20,500 · Civil RightsUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropySTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $12,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$16,841,000Other$13,364,500Arts & Culture$4,951,500Environment$2,937,650Human Services$297,600Civil Rights$233,500Philanthropy$182,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $11,042,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $2,470,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,400,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $2,170,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $1,400,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $1,120,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $1,070,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $672,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $380,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $335,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC: $154,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $145,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $140,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP NEBAGAMON: $130,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $113,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $100,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF COLLECTIONS: $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD PLAYHOUSE INC: $100,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE: $95,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $82,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWebster University: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS: $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetBeyond Differences: $65,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $57,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DE SALUD: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget122 EAST 66TH STREET FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRanken Technical College: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CAMP NEBAGAMON ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF COLLECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGIC HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BE LOUD SOPHIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Webster University ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centene FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…Opa FoundationBerges Family Foundat…The Kranzberg Family …Trio Foundation of St…World Wide Technology…LNS&ARS FoundationPershing Charitable T…Sam and Marilyn Fox F…Regional Cultural and…St Louis Community Fo…
Centene FoundationMO29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centene Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Opa Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · World Wide Technology Foundation · LNS&ARS Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission · St Louis Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Playhouse Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013?

Find your warmest path to Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eric P & Evelyn E Newman Charitable Foundation Dtd 8/1/2013’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home