Skip to content

· Private foundation

Equitrans Midstream Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
143
Grants FY2024still arriving
24
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$2.3MPhilanthropy$681kFood & Nutrition$668kArts & Culture$413kHealth$379kEnvironment$268kHuman Services$262kYouth Development$249kOther$0
02FY2024 · 143 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k104 grants · $177k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $639k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $473k
$2,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$153,000
CHILDRENS HOSP OF PITTSBURGH FDN$65,200
WEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORK$55,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PA$50,000
FOOD HELPERS$50,000
MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK$50,000
SCRANTON PREPARATORY SCHOOL$50,000
GROVE CITY COLLEGE$40,000
CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK$40,000
SALTWORKS THEATRE CO$38,600
WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN$38,000
THE CAPE MAY FUND$35,000
THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$30,000
INTERMEDIATE UNIT ONE ED FDN$30,000
OPERATION WARM INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $367k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $4k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPICE: $500 → 9%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $50k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $600 → 14%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $5k → 15%CASA SAN JOSE: $1k → 11%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $40k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%CASA OF GREENE COUNTY: $35k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 11%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $25k → 13%COMMUNITY COMPASS: $2k → 11%EDUCARE DC: $3k → 14%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $15k → 13%EDUCARE DC: $2k → 14%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $5k → 13%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 11%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $3k → 13%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $50k → 10%COLBYS STARS FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $35k → 10%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $500 → 13%BEVERLYS BIRTHDAYS: $15k → 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 11%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $15k → 12%CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK: $500 → 13%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $1k → 10%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $641 → 12%EDUCARE DC: $3k → 14%EDUCARE DC: $3k → 14%LEMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CORP: $1k → 11%THREE RIVERS YOUTH: $500 → 11%PAULINE AUBERLE FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $2k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $925 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $800 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $800 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $650 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $600 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $500 → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $500 → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%WOMENS CTR & SHELTER GREATER PGH: $1k → 11%COMPUTER REACH: $30k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $2k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $750 → 11%PARTNERS FOR QUALITY FOUNDATION: $530 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 176 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

176 repeat relationships: 99 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

176
312

Total granted

$4.5M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+18%

Still filing today

65%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $528k · revenue +8%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $157k · revenue +61%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORK
    3× · 2022–2024 · $145k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SW PA
    one grant, 2021 · $81k
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PA
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • ON
    OHIO NATURAL ENERGY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +42% · 33% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
9
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
10
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

270 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 270 of the 535 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
264/270
Grantees still filing
185/270
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $155,872 · OtherUNITED WAYINTERMEDIATE UNIT ONE ED FDN: $100,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $157,227 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $126,750 · Other+132 more: $2,278,384 · Other+132 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $527,525 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUN…WEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORK: $145,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORKSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $140,500 · EducationSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A…Davidson College: $135,000 · EducationDavidson CollegeKettering University: $134,343 · EducationKettering UniversityQueens University of Charlotte: $95,000 · EducationQueens University of Charlott…GROVE CITY COLLEGE: $89,750 · EducationGROVE CITY COLLEGEIndiana University Foundation: $70,397 · Education+17 more: $201,282 · Education+17 moreMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $190,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $125,550 · Food & NutritionFOOD HELPERS: $65,850 · Food & Nutrition5 Loaves Food Pantry: $30,000 · Food & NutritionBENTWORTH BLESSINGS INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $16,500 · Food & NutritionCORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC: $139,500 · Human ServicesBEVERLY'S PGH: $101,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesGrowing Up Greene: $35,000 · Human ServicesComputer Reach: $30,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $15,848 · Human Services+5 more: $30,025 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $100,400 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureSALTWORKS THEATRE COMPANY: $33,000 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $25,340 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION: $15,500 · Arts & CultureSANDAL GAP STUDIO: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,049 · Arts & CultureTHE COUNTRY PLAYHOUSE: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $12,000 · Arts & CultureTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $117,672 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENE COUN: $90,000 · PhilanthropyYOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropySCRANTON AREA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $12,550 · PhilanthropyWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $98,750 · EnvironmentALLEGHENY LAND TRUST: $78,320 · EnvironmentResources for the Future Inc: $25,693 · Environment+1 more: $4,000 · Environment
Other$2,818,233Education$1,538,797Food & Nutrition$447,900Human Services$391,373Arts & Culture$286,289Philanthropy$285,222Environment$206,763

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $527,525 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $190,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $157,227 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORK: $145,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $140,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC: $139,500 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetDavidson College: $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKettering University: $134,343 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $126,750 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $125,550 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $117,672 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH: $101,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $100,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $98,750 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Excellence in Education: $90,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENE COUN: $90,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $89,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGHENY LAND TRUST: $78,320 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $70,397 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD HELPERS: $65,850 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH FARM INC: $55,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetOHIO NATURAL ENERGY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS PITTSBURGH: $50,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGrowing Up Greene: $35,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSALTWORKS THEATRE COMPANY: $33,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $31,138 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetASSET INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMarquette University: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetComputer Reach: $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE CAPE MAY FUND: $26,100 over 3y, 13% of budgetFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION: $26,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetResources for the Future Inc: $25,693 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $25,340 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEROME BETTIS BUS STOPS HERE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $20,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBENTWORTH BLESSINGS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetGwens Girls Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR HONDURAN COMMUNITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $16,645 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $15,848 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION: $15,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORK ↗
  • Who funds STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CORNER CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds Kettering University ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY'S PGH ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Queens University of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds Center for Excellence in Education ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENE COUN ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOOD HELPERS ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO NATURAL ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eqt FoundationPA128.1× affinity73 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eqt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · The Grable Foundation · Upmc Group · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · McElhattan Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Allegheny Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Equitrans Midstream Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Equitrans Midstream Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Equitrans Midstream Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Equitrans Midstream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 535 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Equitrans Midstream’s filings →

More from the funding graph