Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$280k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
17
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$18,634
Largest grant, FY2025
$27,694
Organizations funded a year
5 to 19
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$998k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving17$280k35%
FY20245$159k0%
FY202311$117k18%
FY20229$114k0%
FY202117$162k12%
FY202019$161k11%
FY201918$173k28%
FY201819$204k5%
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$503kHealth$345kReligion$266kYouth Development$163kFood & Nutrition$80kPhilanthropy$73kHousing & Shelter$48kEducation$11kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 25 recipients with no EIN on record ($730k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLilac Services for the Blind: $152,032 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetVanessa Behan: $152,032 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMorning Star Boys Ranch: $82,815 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCatholic Charities of Spokane: $71,114 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBelieve in Me: $69,217 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetYoung Womens Christian Association: $67,055 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane: $47,503 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDaybreak Youth Services: $43,951 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWomen & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen: $37,918 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBy the Well Foundation: $35,950 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNew Horizon Care Centers Inc: $28,699 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwest Harvest Emm: $16,191 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWillow Center Inc: $7,884 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetLutherhaven Ministries Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSpokane Guilds' School & Neuromuscular Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA30.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Women Helping Women Fund · United Way of Spokane County · Numerica Credit Union · Project Beauty Share · Providence Health & Services - Washington · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation · The Bergquist Foundation Attn Eric Sachtjen · Multicare Health System · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma with peer funders

About Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma

How much does Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma give?
Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma reported 17 grants totaling $280,206 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 19 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (32%), Health (22%), Religion (17%).
Who are Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Lilac Services for the Blind ($152k), Vanessa Behan ($152k), Morning Star Boys Ranch ($83k).
Does Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Innovia Foundation, The Avista Foundation, Women Helping Women Fund.
Where is Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma based?
Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elizabeth C Pool Charitable Tr Uma’s filings →

More from the funding graph