Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$549kHuman Services$521kEducation$266kHousing & Shelter$165kPhilanthropy$158kEnvironment$100kYouth Development$93kArts & Culture$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
ASPIRO$50,000
CURATIVE CONNECTIONS$42,000
DOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$40,000
GOLDEN HOUSE$35,000
UWGB$20,000
BELLIN COLLEGE$10,000
BRAIN CENTER$10,000
HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$10,000
NEIGHBORWORKS GREEN BAY$5,000
GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
THE RIDGES SANCTUARY$5,000
ENCOMPASS$5,000
NEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GOLDEN HOUSE: $40k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $35k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $35k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $25k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $5k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA: $20k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 33 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
10

Total granted

$1.7M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+9%

Still filing today

70%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +63%
  • CC
    CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $134k · revenue +2%
  • HC
    HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • HS
    HSHS ST VINCENTST MARY'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +94%
  • SV
    ST VINCENTST MARY'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
2
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
Downtown Green Bay Inc

Dgbi works to revitalize the social and economic climate of downtown green bay.

Youth Development
5
New Community Shelter Foundation Inc

New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.

Housing & Shelter
6
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
7
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
8
Greater Green Bay Chamber of Commerce Inc

To strengthen member businesses, enhance economic and workforce development, and improve the quality of life in our community and region.

—
9
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
10
Aging and Disability Resource Center of Brown County Inc

The adrc of brown county supports older adults, adults with disabilities, and caregivers through education, advocacy, and resources. we connect people to answers, in our center, by phone, or at home, so everyone can live with diginity and…

—
11
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
12
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Acts 18 Ministry Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · OtherTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCYWCA: $215,000 · OtherYWCAHSHS ST VINCENTST MARY'S FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherHSHS ST VINCENTST MARY'S FOUNDATIONHSHS ST VINCENTST MARYS HOSPITAL FDN: $100,000 · OtherHSHS ST VINCENTST MARYS HOSPITAL FDNBELLIN COLLEGE INC: $85,000 · OtherBELLIN COLLEGE INCENCOMPASS: $74,500 · OtherENCOMPASSBAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · Other+26 more: $363,700 · Other+26 moreGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN HOUS…ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesENCOMPASS E…GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGREATER GRE…DOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyASPIRO INC: $50,000 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $45,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $134,000 · EmploymentNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $90,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,253,200Human Services$206,000Philanthropy$155,000Education$147,000Employment$134,000Housing & Shelter$105,000Community Improvement$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $140,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $134,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $90,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC: $75,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC: $41,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREEN BAY SAIL & PADDLE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC: $5,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGEREADY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetActs 18 Ministry Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLIN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIRD CREEK PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRO INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE BROWN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BAY SAIL & PADDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kress Foundation IncWI55.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kress Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Wochinske Family Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elizabeth B and Philip J Hendrickson Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph