Skip to content
Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.6MEducation$480kPhilanthropy$310kInternational$230kReligion$100kEnvironment$70kSocial Science$50kHealth$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $221k
  • $250k+2 grants · $800k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY$500,000
BNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$300,000
MOUNT ALBERT GRAMMAR SCHOOL$120,596
MYRIAD USA INC$100,000
A ROCHA USA$37,500
UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD$25,000
MILKEN INSTITUTE$25,000
NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART$20,000
AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB$15,000
BARNABAS FOUNDATION$12,500
EXPLORERS CLUB$10,000
THE ACCESS FUND$10,000
NORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER$10,000
BRAIDED RIVER$10,000
PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NANTUCKET: $10k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $33k → 12%BNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $300k → 16%MILKEN INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OXFORD: $120k → 17%MEDIA STORM LLC: $10k → 20%A ROCHA USA: $25k → 10%PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $30k → 14%CARDUS INC: $25k → 8%BRAIDED RIVER: $10k → 12%OSU FOUNDATION: $50k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $45k → 11%THE AMERICAN ALPINE: $15k → 7%NORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER: $10k → 9%A ROCHA USA: $38k → 7%BARNABAS FOUNDATION: $13k → 7%INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%NEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM AND TELEVISION: $5k → 17%US NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $25k → 11%AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB: $15k → 7%NORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER: $5k → 9%DUKE OF EDINBURGHS AWARD: $19k → 17%NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART: $20k → 14%THE AMERICAN ALPINE: $5k → 7%NORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER: $5k → 9%MILKEN INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%THE MOUNTAINEERS: $15k → 9%EXPLORERS CLUB: $10k → 17%THE MOUNTAINEERS: $7k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INC: $91k → 17%THE MOUNTAINEERS: $5k → 9%PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%BRAIDED RIVER: $15k → 9%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $500k → 17%BRAIDED RIVER: $8k → 9%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $500k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $301k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $140k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $70k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
CO
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 9 repeat orgs$820k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$2.0M
$450k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-4%

Still filing today

78%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +14%
  • AR
    A ROCHA USA INC A ROCHA USA
    2× · 2021–2024 · $63k · revenue +35%
  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OXFORD
    one grant, 2022 · $120k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $91k · revenue -43%
  • Oregon State University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
6
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
7
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
8
The American Institute of Architects

Vision: drive positive change through the power of design and focused activism.mission: aia inspires and empowers architects to improve society and transform the world.

—
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
11
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
12
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The American Alpine Club; the most unlike its peers is 564 Park Avenue Preservation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $1,525,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY+3 more: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $300,000 · OtherBNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDMOUNT ALBERT GRAMMAR SCHOOL: $217,421 · OtherMOUNT ALBERT GRAMMAR SCHOOLAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OXFORD: $120,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OXFORDTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $50,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTEUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $32,500 · Other+14 more: $206,547 · Other+14 moreFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INC: $90,536 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $70,000 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $50,000 · EducationA ROCHA USA INC A ROCHA USA: $62,500 · EnvironmentTHE MOUNTAINEERS: $27,000 · EnvironmentBRAIDED RIVER: $23,000 · EnvironmentMYRIAD USA INC: $100,000 · InternationalNORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBarnabas Foundation: $12,500 · Religion
Arts & Culture$1,575,500Other$926,468Education$210,536Environment$112,500International$100,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000Religion$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY: $1,525,500 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INC: $90,536 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA ROCHA USA INC A ROCHA USA: $62,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNTAINEERS: $27,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRAIDED RIVER: $23,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST AVALANCHE CENTER: $20,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUS NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UN WOMEN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EXPLORERS CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ACCESS FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN IN FILM & TELEVISION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Seattle FoundationWA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eggnog Latte Foundation Dba Renee and Jeff Harbers Family Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home