Skip to content
Edith J Goode Residuary Trust Pnc Bank N A at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Edith J Goode Residuary Trust Pnc Bank N A

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$935kHousing & Shelter$50kHealth$28kHuman Services$27kPhilanthropy$15kEnvironment$10kFood & Nutrition$5k
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $105k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OK HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE$15,000
HEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE$15,000
HUMANE COLORADO$10,000
ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$10,000
ANIMAL PROTECTION OF NEW MEXICO$10,000
BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER$10,000
SOJOURNER CENTER$10,000
AHIMSA HOUSE$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER$7,500
HOUSTON SPCA$5,000
KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY$4,535
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $15k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $15k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $15k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$639k · 26 repeat orgs$553k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
63

Total granted

$639k
$498k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+31%

Still filing today

85%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE
    5× · 2018–2026 · $65k · revenue +70%
  • TR
    THE RAPTOR TRUST
    3× · 2017–2022 · $41k · revenue +35%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • HA
    Humane Action Pittsburghgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +516% · 32% of their budget
  • DC
    DUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +5%
  • TM
    THE MARYLAND SPCA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
2
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
3
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
4
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals
5
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
6
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
7
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
8
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
9
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
10
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
11
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
12
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless; the most unlike its peers is Keystone Human Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/79
Grantees still filing
59/79
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RAPTOR TRUST: $41,377 · AnimalsNEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC: $37,596 · AnimalsAHIMSA HOUSE INC: $33,000 · AnimalsOperation Catnip of Gainesville: $30,000 · AnimalsLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $30,000 · AnimalsKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $27,792 · Animals+59 more: $579,999 · Animals+59 moreOK HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,000 · OtherOK HUMANE SOCIETYUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $30,000 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA RED…FAUNALYTICS: $20,000 · OtherFAUNALYTICSSENIOR PET AND ANIMAL RESCUE: $18,066 · OtherSENIOR PET AND ANIMAL RESCUENortheast Avian Rescue Inc: $17,500 · OtherNortheast Avian Rescue IncHUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTER: $17,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF ROCHESTERSOUTH HILLS PET RESCUE &: $15,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA VETERINARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETY VETERINARY: $12,500 · Other+15 more: $113,541 · Other+15 moreURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $65,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEGASUS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyKEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES: $10,000 · Health
Animals$779,764Other$311,607Human Services$75,000Philanthropy$15,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $41,377 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC: $37,596 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetAHIMSA HOUSE INC: $33,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetOperation Catnip of Gainesville: $30,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $27,792 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetANIMALS AND SOCIETY INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS: $23,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPACIFIC PRIMATE SANCTUARY INC: $21,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFAUNALYTICS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Action Pittsburgh: $17,502 over 1y, 32% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC: $17,501 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $17,501 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNortheast Avian Rescue Inc: $17,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetFriends of the Shelter Inc dba Better Together Animal Alliance: $17,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT PRIMATE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA VETERINARY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $13,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHome For Good Dog Rescue Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSECOND CITY CANINE RESCUE: $12,100 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR LIFE RESCUE: $12,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetLANCASTER SPCA: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetANIMAL AID OF TULSA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetST HUBERT'S GIRALDA D/B/A ST HUBERT'S ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeARTS SPEAK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPetaid Colorado: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYLESTONE EQUINE RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetKEYSTONE HUMAN SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetATLANTA ANIMAL RESCUE FRIENDS INC: $8,444 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLIVE LOVE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAll About Equine Animal Rescue Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSan Antonio Pets Alive Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAT TOWN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE INDIANA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLilys Legacy Senior Dog Sanctuary: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duffield Family F…Petsmart Charities IncThe American Society …Humane World for Anim…Greater Good CharitiesBISSELL Pet FoundationPetco LoveThe Grey Muzzle Organ…The Michelson Found A…Best Friends Animal S…Pedigree FoundationThornton S Jr and Kat…
The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's FundCA63.8× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Humane World for Animals Inc · Greater Good Charities · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Petco Love · The Grey Muzzle Organization · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc · Best Friends Animal Society · Pedigree Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edith J Goode Residuary Trust Pnc Bank N A funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edith J Goode Residuary Trust Pnc Bank N A. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    12get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edith J Goode Residuary Trust Pnc Bank N A’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home