Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edelson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$349kCivil Rights$58kHealth$33kEnvironment$20kPublic Benefit$16kYouth Development$8kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN PARK ZOO$8,000
ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY$6,000
PETA$6,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$6,000
MERCY FOR ANIMALS$5,000
ACLU$5,000
PAWS CHICAGO$5,000
GLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTS$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$5,000
THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY$5,000
TIGER HAVEN$4,500
THE GORILLA FOUNDATION$4,500
TIGER CREEK WILDLIFE REFUGE$4,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$4,000
ASPCA$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GORILLA FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%ASPCA: $4k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 14%TIGER HAVEN: $5k → 13%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY: $5k → 14%BEST FRIENDS: $4k → 9%LINCOLN PARK ZOO: $8k → 14%PETA: $6k → 19%THE GORILLA FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%ASPCA: $4k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 14%TIGER HAVEN: $5k → 13%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY: $5k → 14%LINCOLN PARK ZOO: $6k → 14%PETA: $6k → 19%THE GORILLA FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%ASPCA: $4k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY: $5k → 14%LINCOLN PARK ZOO: $6k → 14%PETA: $6k → 19%THE GORILLA FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY: $4k → 14%LINCOLN PARK ZOO: $6k → 14%PETA: $5k → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $6k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES: $4k → 14%MERCY FOR ANIMALS: $5k → 14%PETA: $4k → 19%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $6k → 17%LINCOLN PARK ZOO: $5k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%MERCY FOR ANIMALS: $5k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 17%MERCY FOR ANIMALS: $5k → 14%ASPCA: $5k → 17%ACLU: $5k → 17%ACLU: $5k → 17%NATURE CONSERVATORY: $7k → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $6k → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $6k → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $6k → 14%ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY: $5k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $5k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $5k → 14%PAWS CHICAGO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CA
UT
VA
NM
TN
DC
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$483k · 26 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
3

Total granted

$483k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+36%

Still filing today

73%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureCrime & LegalPublic BenefitEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Anti-Cruelty Society
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +30%
  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +82%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • CHIMP HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +36%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • CT
    CHICAGO TRIBUNE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
8
Last Chance for Animals

Dedicated to ending animal abuse and exploitation through education, public outreach and investigations.

Animals
9
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
10
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
11
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
12
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Foundation for Rescued Animals Dba Tiger Creek Animal Sanctuary and the most unlike its peers is Chicago Tribune Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
1/22
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $33,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYThe Anti-Cruelty Society — $28,000 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty SocietyPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $28,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INCHumane World for Animals Inc — $26,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncGLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTS — $23,000 · AnimalsGLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTSTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE — $23,000 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEEPAWS CHICAGO — $23,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGONATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $22,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANC…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $19,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSTIGER HAVEN INC — $17,500 · AnimalsTIGER HAVEN INCFOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE — $15,000 · AnimalsNOAH'S REST INC — $13,500 · AnimalsEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $11,000 · Animals+2 more — $7,000 · AnimalsPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $33,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODMERCY FOR ANIMALS — $24,000 · OtherMERCY FOR ANIMALSThe Gorilla Foundation — $22,500 · OtherThe Gorilla FoundationACLU — $22,500 · OtherACLUNATURE CONSERVATORY — $15,500 · OtherNATURE CONSERVATORYSAFE HUMANE CHICAGO — $13,000 · OtherSAFE HUMANE CHICAGOBEST FRIENDS — $8,000 · OtherBEST FRIENDS+2 more — $3,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $19,000 · Crime & LegalSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $16,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $1,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $16,000 · Public BenefitWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $4,000 · Environment
Animals$289,500Other$141,500Crime & Legal$19,000Arts & Culture$17,500Public Benefit$16,000Environment$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society — $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $28,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTS — $23,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE — $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gorilla Foundation — $22,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $22,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC — $17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE — $15,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds GLOBAL SANCTUARY FOR ELEPHANTS
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO
  • Who funds The Gorilla Foundation
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR RESCUED ANIMALS DBA TIGER CREEK ANIMAL SANCTUARY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds TIGER HAVEN INC
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC
  • Who funds FOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE
  • Who funds NOAH'S REST INC
  • Who funds EQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED
  • Who funds PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY12.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edelson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph