Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed & June Prein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$426k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$278kHealth$228kReligion$209kHuman Services$191kArts & Culture$143kPhilanthropy$139kEnvironment$117kRecreation & Sports$68kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY FREE BED FOUNDATION$150,000
ST MARY'S FOUNDATION$75,000
THE ADVANCEMENT CENTER$25,000
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER$20,000
FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS$10,000
GRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY$10,000
JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION$10,000
CAMP AO-WA-KIYA$10,000
HOLY CROSS MISSION CENTER$10,000
HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILD & FAMILY LIFE$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$10,000
FOREST HILLS SCHOOLS$10,000
LITERACY CENTER OF WEST MICHIGAN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $10k → 10%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $10k → 10%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $7k → 10%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 26 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
5

Total granted

$1.0M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-4%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $109k · revenue +57%
  • TJ
    THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +235%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • AS
    AUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -4%
  • MB
    MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +36%
  • KC
    KENT COUNTY YOUTH AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Whole Child Collaborative

To provide a holistic, multidisciplinary education to learners of all abilities

Education
3
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
4
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment
5
Fort Wayne Museum of Art Inc

The fort wayne museum of art will collect, preserve and present american and related art to engage and educate broad and diverse audiences throughout the region and add value to their lives.

Arts & Culture
6
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
7
Great Lakes Center for the Arts

The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.

Arts & Culture
8
Michigan Legacy Art Park

Inspire awareness, appreciation and passion for michigan's history and stories, culture and environment through the arts.

Arts & Culture
9
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
10
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
11
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
12
West Central Initiative

Serving to improve west central minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. vision of a vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable world starts here in west central minnesota.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian River Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S FOUNDATION: $170,000 · OtherST MARY'S FOUNDATIONMARY FREE BED FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherMARY FREE BED FOUNDATIONFREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS: $100,000 · OtherFREDERIK MEIJER GARDENSFOREST HILLS SCHOOLS: $87,000 · OtherFOREST HILLS SCHOOLSGRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY: $85,000 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONYCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $40,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS MISSION CENTER: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $125,650 · Other+13 moreWASHINGTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $109,000 · EducationWASHINGTON TOWNS…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $58,000 · EducationUniversity of No…THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $27,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING ALL…Literacy Center of West Michigan: $10,000 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $90,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $42,200 · HealthCHILDREN'S H…AUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY INC: $15,000 · HealthAUTISM SUPPO…INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · HealthTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 · PhilanthropyINDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A Cause: $27,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $25,500 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $9,000 · Arts & CultureMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $4,300 · EnvironmentTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL: $2,700 · EnvironmentKENT COUNTY YOUTH AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Youth Development
Other$787,650Education$204,000Health$154,200Philanthropy$99,000Human Services$66,000Arts & Culture$55,500Environment$17,000Youth Development$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $109,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $90,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $58,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $42,200 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $25,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC: $21,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetAUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetLiteracy Center of West Michigan: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKENT COUNTY YOUTH AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $4,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL: $2,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Center of West Michigan ↗
  • Who funds CAMP AO-WA-KIYA ↗
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KENT COUNTY YOUTH AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Korff Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Frey Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ed & June Prein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed & June Prein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Learning Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ed & June Prein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph