How much did ED & JUNE PREIN FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of ED & JUNE PREIN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k16 grants · $44k
$10k–50k11 grants · $145k
$50k–250k1 grant · $95k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

ST MARY'S FOUNDATION$95,000
THE ADVANCEMENT CENTER$25,000
HOLY CROSS MISSION CENTER$20,000
CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER$15,200
AUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY$15,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$10,000
HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION FOR CHILD & FAMILY LIFE$10,000
JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION$10,000
FOREST HILLS SCHOOLS$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
GRAND RAPIDS SYMPHONY$10,000
FREDERIK MEIJER GARDENS$10,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH MICHIGAN$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$793k · 26 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$793k

$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%

+48%

Still filing today

42%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MAYO CLINIC
8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +29%
JI
JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +128%
FH
FAMILY HOPE FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +150%

Funded once

MB
MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDENS
one grant, 2017 · $10k
KC
KENT COUNTY YOUTH AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATIONgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +48%
AS
ALL SAINTS ACADEMY
one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Land Conservancy of West Michigan

The Land Conservancy of West Michigan exists to help people protect, enjoy and care for natural land in West Michigan.

Environment

Childrens Center of Wayne County Inc

The children's center provides behavioral healthcare treatment services for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders or developmental disabilities. the organization also provides foster care, independent living and…

Human Services

Community Council of Idaho Inc

To strengthen families in our communities by offering opportunities in education, housing, health, employment and legal services.

Human Services

Iowa Center for Children's Justice

ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services.

Civil Rights

Children's Center Early Intervention &

The Children's Center, as a nonprofit organization, provides quality, family-focused services for children; specializes in meeting the developmental needs of children with special needs by offering programs which encourage individual…

Health

West Central Initiative

Serving to improve west central minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. uniting ideas and resources to help people and communities create a better tomorrow.

Philanthropy

Indianapolis Children's Choir

The Indianapolis Chidlrens Choir nurtures and inspires student achievement through quality music education and the pursuit of artistic excellence in choral music performance.

Arts & Culture

Inter-Lakes Community Action

Our mission: empowering people to embrace their strengths and opportunities.our vision: sustainable communities where children, families, and individuals reach their full potential. our values: compassion, dedication, innovation,…

Human Services

Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health

Montgomery County Community Foundation

Creating legacies to fulfill philanthropic dreams through grants to nonprofits and scholarships

Philanthropy

International Center of Photography

The international center of photography is a center where photographs are collected, protected, researched, and exhibited; a place where students of all ages and accomplishments learn to make images and are challenged by technical and…

Arts & Culture

International Community Health Services

Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian River Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mayo Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

13/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$649,050Health$117,200Philanthropy$89,000Human Services$46,000Education$27,000Arts & Culture$27,000Youth Development$7,000Environment$2,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Korff Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · The Community Foundation of The · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ED & JUNE PREIN FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270292064 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on AUTISM SUPPORT OF KENT COUNTY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ed & June Prein Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ed & June Prein Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ED & JUNE PREIN FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ed & June Prein Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ED & JUNE PREIN FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ed & June Prein Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph