Skip to content

· Private foundation

EBR Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$539kEnvironment$245kInternational$170kPublic Safety & Disaster$136kRecreation & Sports$136kCivil Rights$100kEducation$100kHealth$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$50,000
WOODFORD HUMANE SOCIETY$30,000
GREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FNDN$30,000
NACDS FOUNDATION$20,000
WATOTO WORLD$20,000
EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH$20,000
LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS$20,000
KENTUCKY EQUINE ADOPTION CENTER$20,000
NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$15,000
S SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PHILADELPHIA$10,000
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$7,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$7,000
WALTHOUR-MOSS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WATOTOWORLD: $40k → 10%MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $15k → 11%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PHILADELPHIA: $10k → 22%US FRIENDS OF D SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TR: $10k → 10%S SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH: $20k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 14%LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS: $40k → 8%NACDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%WOODFORD HUMANE SOCIETY: $30k → 10%KENTUCKY EQUINE ADOPTION CENTER: $20k → 12%KENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%WATOTOWORLD: $35k → 10%US FRIENDS OF D SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TR: $10k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH: $20k → 15%NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $12k → 14%GREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FNDN: $35k → 8%NACDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%WOODFORD HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 10%WATOTOWORLD: $30k → 10%EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH: $20k → 15%COMMUNITY FNDN FOR GREATER ATLANTA: $13k → 13%LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS: $30k → 8%NACDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%WOODFORD HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 10%WATOTO WORLD: $30k → 10%COMMUNITY FNDN FOR GREATER ATLANTA: $13k → 13%GREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FNDN: $30k → 8%NACDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%WOODFORD HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 10%WATOTO WORLD: $20k → 10%COMMUNITY FNDN FOR GREATER ATLANTA: $13k → 13%GREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FNDN: $30k → 8%NACDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%WOODFORD HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 10%LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS: $20k → 8%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $12k → 7%LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS: $20k → 8%LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS: $20k → 8%GREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FNDN: $11k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS: $18k → 7%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $60k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $50k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $42k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $30k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $16k → 14%CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
KY
VA
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of EBR Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

EBR Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 35 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
9

Total granted

$1.5M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+101%

Still filing today

69%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Chicago Zoological Society
    8× · 2017–2024 · $236k · revenue +43%
  • WI
    WATOTOWORLD INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +118% · 29% of their budget
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $156k · revenue +420%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue -8%
  • ME
    MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +146%
  • US
    UNITED STATES EVENTING ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
3
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
10
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
11
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
12
Wildlife Sos

Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Zoological Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Exceptional Education Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
31/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chicago Zoological Society: $235,750 · AnimalsChicago Zoological SocietyWoodford Humane Society Inc: $112,000 · AnimalsWoodford Humane Society IncNORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $60,000 · AnimalsNORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIET…DANNY & RONS RESCUE: $31,500 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RESCUEKENTUCKY EQUINE HUMANE CENTER INC: $20,000 · Animals+4 more: $35,500 · Animals+4 moreNACDS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherNACDS FOUNDATIONTHE WALTHOUR - MOSS FOUNDATION: $61,500 · OtherTHE WALTHOUR - MOSS FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $47,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYUS FRIENDS OF D SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TR: $33,000 · OtherUS FRIENDS OF D SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRS SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIO: $31,000 · OtherS SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIOS SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC: $47,500 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER …HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $21,500 · OtherRush University Medical Center: $32,000 · OtherRush University Medical CenterFOOD PANTRY FOR WOODFORD COUNTY INC: $27,500 · Other+20 more: $145,354 · Other+20 moreLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $155,500 · EnvironmentLAKE FOREST …WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $42,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLI…WATOTOWORLD INC: $170,000 · Youth DevelopmentWATOTOWORLD …ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentATLANTA CHAR…+1 more: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FOUNDATION: $135,500 · Public Safety & DisasterEXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH INC: $70,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $19,500 · EducationGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationKENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Animals$494,750Other$571,854Environment$197,500Youth Development$190,000Public Safety & Disaster$135,500Education$99,500Recreation & Sports$54,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChicago Zoological Society: $235,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWATOTOWORLD INC: $170,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $155,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetGREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FOUNDATION: $135,500 over 7y, 74% of budgetWoodford Humane Society Inc: $112,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH INC: $70,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetTHE WALTHOUR - MOSS FOUNDATION: $61,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $47,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC: $47,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $31,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD PANTRY FOR WOODFORD COUNTY INC: $27,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY EQUINE HUMANE CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $17,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC IN COMMON INC: $11,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SANDHILLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES EVENTING ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELAWA FARM FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds WATOTOWORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES DISASTER TRAINING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Woodford Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WALTHOUR - MOSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY HORSE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD PANTRY FOR WOODFORD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY EQUINE HUMANE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CHARITY CLAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SNOW LEOPARD TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC IN COMMON INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SANDHILLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Lightner Sams Foundation of Wyoming · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization EBR Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from EBR Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Vermont Studio Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to EBR Foundation?

Find your warmest path to EBR Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on EBR’s filings →

More from the funding graph