Skip to content
Earthshare Chapters Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Earthshare Chapters Inc

Earthshare provides individuals, businesses, and nonprofits with inspiration and tools to work together for a just and sustainable world.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$4.8MEmployment$464kAnimals$266kPhilanthropy$165kInternational$13k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $57,144, the rows itemized in this filing. The $168,447 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $111,303 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$7,601
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARTHSHARE WASHINGTON$10,983
ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY$9,706
OYSTER RECOVERY PARTNERSHIP$9,651
OWL MOON RAPTOR CENTER$7,601
POTOMAC RIVERKEEPER NETWORK$6,945
AMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST$6,684
ROCK CREEK CONSERVANCY$5,574
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%ENVIRONMENTAL FUND OF ARIZONA: $55k → 11%UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS: $13k → 8%RAILS-TO-TRAILS CONSERVANCY -PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER: $15k → 8%EARTHSHARE PENNSYLVANIA - CHAPTER: $17k → 22%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $22k → 10%EARTHSHARE CALIFORNIA: $30k → 10%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $16k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $32k → 14%OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER: $13k → 5%THE WILDS: $12k → 15%EARTHSHARE ILLINOIS - CHAPTER: $28k → 14%EARTHSHARE NEW JERSEY: $22k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $36k → 7%ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY: $50k → 11%C&O CANAL TRUST: $24k → 12%EARTHSHARE MID-ATLANTIC - CHAPTER: $26k → 19%ENVIRONMENTAL FUND OF ARIZONA: $32k → 11%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%EARTHSHARE CALIFORNIA: $17k → 10%EARTHSHARE NEW JERSEY: $20k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $22k → 7%ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY: $43k → 11%C & O CANAL TRUST: $20k → 12%EARTHSHARE CALIFORNIA: $13k → 10%EARTHSHARE NEW JERSEY: $12k → 11%ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY: $35k → 11%C&O CANAL TRUST: $17k → 12%ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY: $31k → 11%C & O CANAL TRUST: $15k → 12%NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY: $16k → 11%EARTHSHARE: $743k → 8%ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY: $13k → 11%EARTHSHARE: $447k → 14%EARTHSHARE: $667k → 8%EARTHSHARE: $24k → 14%EARTHSHARE: $638k → 8%POTOMAC RIVERKEEPER: $13k → 14%EARTHSHARE MULTISTATE: $87k → 8%EARTHSHARE: $17k → 14%ES - FLORIDA: $21k → 8%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $13k → 17%EARTHSHARE (ESC): $20k → 8%EARTHSHARE WASHINGTON: $12k → 14%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $22k → 8%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $17k → 8%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $16k → 8%POTOMAC CONSERVANCY: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 41 repeat orgs$489k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
23

Total granted

$1.9M
$484k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+8%

Still filing today

98%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    C&O CANAL TRUST INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $76k · revenue +148%
  • EN
    EARTHSHARE NEW JERSEY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +54%
  • OR
    OYSTER RECOVERY PARTNERSHIP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • EC
    EARTHSHARE CHAPTERS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $271k · revenue -87%
  • EI
    EARTHSHARE ILLINOIS - CHAPTER
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environment Now
—
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
4
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
5
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
6
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
7
National Ecological Observatory Network Inc
Recreation & Sports
8
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
9
National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

The national caucus of environmental legislators empowers a nonpartisan network of legislative champions to protect, conserve, and improve the natural and human environment.

Education
10
Chagrin River Watershed Partners Inc

Preserving and enhancing the scenic and environmental quality of the ecosystem of the chagrin river, lake erie and other ohio watersheds in a manner which assures a sustainable future for people, plants and animals.

Human Services
11
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
12
The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation

The conservation fund is in the business of conservation, creating innovative solutions that drive nature-based action for climate protection, sustainable economies and vibrant communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wilderness Society; the most unlike its peers is Acadia Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/65
Grantees still filing
43/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARTHSHARE: $3,181,627 · EnvironmentEARTHSHAREANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC: $217,455 · Environment+40 more: $1,085,579 · Environment+40 moreENVIRONMENTAL FUND FOR ARIZONA INC DBA EFAZ: $95,209 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $89,461 · OtherOYSTER RECOVERY PARTNERSHIP INC: $68,462 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF CALIFORNIA EARTHSHARE CALIFORNIA: $60,327 · OtherALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $49,308 · OtherEARTHSHARE ILLINOIS - CHAPTER: $28,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,251 · Other+3 more: $17,195 · OtherEARTHSHARE CHAPTERS INC: $271,108 · PhilanthropyEARTHSHARE NEW JERSEY INC: $71,210 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,730 · PhilanthropyOHIO WILDLIFE CENTER: $67,199 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC: $58,838 · AnimalsCOLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION: $53,510 · AnimalsOWL MOON RAPTOR CENTER INC: $33,691 · AnimalsNATIONAL AQUARIUM INC: $31,342 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $11,272 · Animals+2 more: $14,831 · AnimalsOhio To Erie Trail Fund: $69,948 · Arts & CultureGlobal Impact: $19,288 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $12,655 · InternationalParks & Trails New York Inc: $19,001 · Recreation & SportsOHIO BIRD SANCTUARY INC: $5,403 · Crime & Legal
Environment$4,484,661Other$429,638Philanthropy$348,048Animals$270,683Arts & Culture$69,948International$31,943Recreation & Sports$19,001Crime & Legal$5,403

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHSHARE: $3,181,627 over 8y, 15% of budgetEARTHSHARE CHAPTERS INC: $271,108 over 1y, 10% of budgetANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC: $217,455 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL FUND FOR ARIZONA INC DBA EFAZ: $95,209 over 3y, 96% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $89,461 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetC&O CANAL TRUST INC: $76,410 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetEARTHSHARE NEW JERSEY INC: $71,210 over 5y, 16% of budgetOhio To Erie Trail Fund: $69,948 over 7y, 16% of budgetOYSTER RECOVERY PARTNERSHIP INC: $68,462 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $67,753 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO WILDLIFE CENTER: $67,199 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $67,147 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC DBA EARTHSHARE NC: $65,099 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF CALIFORNIA EARTHSHARE CALIFORNIA: $60,327 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF WILD ANIMALS INC: $58,838 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS ZOOLOGICAL PARK ASSOCIATION: $53,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $50,872 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $49,308 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPotomac Riverkeeper Network: $48,681 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetEARTH DAY NEW YORK INC: $47,238 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetNature Forward: $47,219 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $47,183 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PARKS AND FORESTS FOUNDATION INC: $41,262 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetEnvironmental Fund For Texas Inc: $39,159 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetEARTHSHARE WASHINGTON: $37,136 over 4y, 20% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC: $34,334 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOWL MOON RAPTOR CENTER INC: $33,691 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $32,214 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF COLUMBUS AND FRANKLIN COUNTY METRO PARKS: $31,474 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetNATIONAL AQUARIUM INC: $31,342 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $31,162 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $28,987 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25,641 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $25,324 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $22,644 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $21,809 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $19,288 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetParks & Trails New York Inc: $19,001 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $18,773 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC: $18,033 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAGRICULTURAL STEWARDSHIP ASSN INC: $16,473 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $14,301 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $13,438 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CHESTNUT LAND TRUST INC: $13,252 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $12,655 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Recycles: $12,068 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOWARD COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC: $11,655 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $11,272 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

EarthshareChesapeake Bay TrustPatagoniaorgThe Keith Campbell Fo…Ibm International Fou…National Fish and Wil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Greater Washington Co…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Veverka Family Founda…The Elmo FoundationFrederick Henry Princ…
EarthshareDC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earthshare · Chesapeake Bay Trust · Patagoniaorg · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Ibm International Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Veverka Family Foundation · The Elmo Foundation · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earthshare Chapters Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earthshare Chapters Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Housatonic Valley Association Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
  • Anacostia Watershed Society Inc: 15% of income from government
  • The Howard County Conservancy Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Oyster Recovery Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • National Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Earthshare Chapters’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home