Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl & Brenda Shapiro Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$2.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Earl & Brenda Shapiro Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Brown University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’19
0
’20
0
’21
0
’22
25
’23
11
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$7.6MArts & Culture$1.5MSocial Science$694kEnvironment$613kFood & Nutrition$245kCivil Rights$225kCommunity Improvement$50kHealth$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $975k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
$100,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Brown University$2,000,000
The Trustees of Princeton University$500,000
University of Chicago - Division Social Science$130,000
Inside Climate News$125,000
Steppenwolf Theatre Company$125,000
Nourishing Hope$100,000
University of Chicago$100,000
Anti-Defamation League$100,000
The Aspen Institute$100,000
One World Network of Schools$75,000
Wild Salmon Center$70,000
Yale School of Architecture$50,000
Northwestern Memorial Foundation$34,000
VIA Art Fund$15,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SGA Youth and Family Services: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 19 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
50

Total granted

$3.6M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+29%

Still filing today

47%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceHealthEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +81%
  • ST
    STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +129%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • BU
    Brown University
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
  • AI
    Art Institute of Chicago - Exhibitions Trust
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • AI
    Art Institute Chicago - Exhibitions Trust
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leap Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Brown University: $2,000,000 · OtherBrown UniversityThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,000,000 · OtherThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityUniversity of Chicago - Division Social Science: $393,666 · OtherUniversity of Chicago - Division Social ScienceArt Institute of Chicago - Exhibitions Trust: $250,000 · OtherArt Institute Chicago - Exhibitions Trust: $250,000 · Other+54 more: $2,109,417 · Other+54 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY: $4,000,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITYINSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC: $250,000 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $200,000 · Social ScienceSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $250,000 · Arts & CultureSkyArt NFP: $30,000 · Arts & CultureVIA ART FUND INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200,000 · Civil RightsUniversity of Chicago: $125,000 · EducationTHE CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $30,000 · EducationLEAP INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationWILD SALMON CENTER: $100,000 · Animals
Other$6,003,083Community Improvement$4,000,000Social Science$450,000Arts & Culture$305,000Civil Rights$200,000Education$180,000Animals$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $4,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC: $250,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $250,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSkyArt NFP: $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING BETWEEN THE LINES NFP: $15,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetVIA ART FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSGA YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEAP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARTH SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIG Academy: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNICASIO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERNWOOD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INSIDE CLIMATE NEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds SkyArt NFP ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reva and David Logan FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reva and David Logan Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl & Brenda Shapiro Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl & Brenda Shapiro Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Earl & Brenda Shapiro’s filings →

More from the funding graph