· Public charity
Kistler Tiffany Foundation
Provide support for children and adults who are mentally, socially or physically deprived through no fault of their own.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MUSIC WORKS | $31,456 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2023 · $110k · revenue +238%
- TCTHE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC2× · 2022–2023 · $106k · revenue +19%
- MMUSICWORKS2× · 2023–2024 · $87k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- TITODAY IS A GOOD DAYone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +19%
- DBDAILY BREAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +3%
- GFG FRED DIBONA JR MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.
Melmark is a human services provider with premier private special education schools, professional development, training, and research centers. melmark is committed to enhancing the lives of individuals within diverse communities with…
Potential engages children and adults with autism in personalized programs that help them realize their full potential.
Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.
To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.
We "make dreams come true." we provide children and adults with autism, intellectual/developmental disabilities and behavioral health challenges and their families the education, services and resources needed to be self-reliant,…
Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…
To form relationships which support people to achieve their life goals in the areas of residential, employment, meaningful community engagement and personal services.
The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.
The arc of essex county provides advocacy and services empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to realize a lifetime of personal achievement and full partnership in the community.
Linwood creates the possibility of extraordinary lives for children and adults living with autism and related developmental disabilities by providing education, vocational training, residential support, and employment opportunities.
To empower individuals to lead fulfilling and productive lives at home and in the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Royer-Greaves School for Blind and the most unlike its peers is Student-Run Emergency Housing Unit of Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TODAY IS A GOOD DAY ↗
- Who funds DAILY BREAD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds G FRED DIBONA JR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSICWORKS ↗
- Who funds PILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE ↗
- Who funds A STEP UP ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds LIGUORI INC ↗
- Who funds BARC DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds The Center for Autism ↗
- Who funds ROYER-GREAVES SCHOOL FOR BLIND ↗
- Who funds STUDENT-RUN EMERGENCY HOUSING UNIT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds THE ELWYN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF THE DELAWARE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds PLANNED LIFETIME ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF NEW JERSEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Eagles Autism Challenge Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Foundation for Delaware County · The Wawa Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kistler Tiffany Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.