Skip to content
Eagan Family Charitable Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Eagan Family Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$197k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$298kReligion$246kFood & Nutrition$108kHuman Services$96kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kInternational$27kPublic Benefit$26kEnvironment$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN$20,000
ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$15,000
DEEP RIVER FIRE DEPT$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
CT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION$10,000
VISITING NURSES OF THE LOWER VALLEY$10,000
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,500
ESTUARY COUNCIL$8,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE & THE JIMMY FUND$6,000
ROSE CITY LEARNING CENTER$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$5,000
ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH)$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN: $20k → 7%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $10k → 9%INNER CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%CT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN: $15k → 7%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $10k → 9%INNER CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN: $15k → 7%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $10k → 9%INNER CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN: $15k → 7%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $10k → 9%INNER CITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $10k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $10k → 9%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $10k → 17%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $10k → 8%ST MARKS CHURCH: $10k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 11%ST MARKS CHURCH: $10k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 11%ST MARKS CHURCH: $10k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 11%ST MARKS CHURCH: $10k → 7%DEEP RIVER FIRE DEPT: $10k → 7%ST JOSEPH CHURCH: $10k → 7%ST JOSEPH CHURCH: $10k → 7%ST JOSEPH CHURCH: $10k → 7%DEEP RIVER AMBULANCE: $10k → 7%ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $15k → 7%ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 7%ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 7%VISITING NURSES OF THE LOWER VALLEY: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$891k · 34 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
1

Total granted

$891k
$1k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +145%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +162%
  • DR
    DEEP RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • EC
    ESTRUARY COUNCIL (MEALS ON WHEELS)
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
The Miriam Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
9
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
11
Riordan Clinic Inc

To provide medical research and education and to serve in ways that stimulates an epidemic of health among those interested in improving their well-being.

—
12
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haitian Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Warriors for Warriors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN: $85,000 · OtherTHE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHENALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH: $80,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCHANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH): $72,500 · OtherANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH)ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCHTHE INNER-CITY FOUNDATION FOR CHARITY & EDUCATION INC: $40,000 · OtherTHE INNER-CITY FOUNDATION FOR CHARITY & EDUCATION INCFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSIONS INC: $40,000 · OtherFATHERS OF ST EDMUND SOUTHERN MISSIONS INCST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSALVATION ARMY: $33,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+22 more: $191,165 · Other+22 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $48,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer…Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $12,000 · HealthTerri Brodeur Brea…American Diabetes Association: $10,500 · HealthAmerican Diabetes …+1 more: $5,000 · HealthDEEP RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $17,000 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalWARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC: $25,500 · Public BenefitTRI-TOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU INC: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentFeeding America: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$686,665Health$155,500Public Safety & Disaster$30,000International$27,000Public Benefit$25,500Youth Development$9,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $48,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNER-CITY FOUNDATION FOR CHARITY & EDUCATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetDEEP RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $30,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetWARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC: $25,500 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetVISITING NURSES OF THE LOWER VALLEY INC: $18,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTerri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTRI-TOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDEEP RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLESEX HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INNER-CITY FOUNDATION FOR CHARITY & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEEP RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSES OF THE LOWER VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-TOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU INC ↗
  • Who funds DEEP RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Rose City Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eagan Family Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eagan Family Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Tri-Town Youth Services Bureau Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eagan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home