· Private foundation
Eagan Family Charitable Foundation Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SHORELINE SOUP KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| ST PIO ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $15,000 |
| CT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH | $10,000 |
| DEEP RIVER FIRE DEPT | $10,000 |
| VISITING NURSES OF THE LOWER VALLEY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,500 |
| ESTUARY COUNCIL | $8,000 |
| DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE & THE JIMMY FUND | $6,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D | $5,000 |
| ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL (NORWICH) | $5,000 |
| EDMUNDITE MISSIONS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 18% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +145%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +132%- WFWARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- ECESTRUARY COUNCIL (MEALS ON WHEELS)one grant, 2017 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.
As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
To provide medical research and education and to serve in ways that stimulates an epidemic of health among those interested in improving their well-being.
Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haitian Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Warriors for Warriors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INNER-CITY FOUNDATION FOR CHARITY & EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEEP RIVER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSES OF THE LOWER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT BURNS CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-TOWN YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds DEEP RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Rose City Learning Center ↗
- Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eagan Family Charitable Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tri-Town Youth Services Bureau Inc — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.