Skip to content
E4e Relief LLC at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

E4e Relief LLC

We empower companies and individuals to respond to crises by providing a global, charitable solution in times of need.

$40M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$14MHealth$7.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.2MHuman Services$1.0MInternational$365kPhilanthropy$332kArts & Culture$250kFood & Nutrition$126k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $5,256,577, the rows itemized in this filing. The $40,297,898 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,041,321 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
  • $250k+2 grants · $5.1M
$127,206
Median grant
4
States reached
$95M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$4,658,404
DARDEN DIMES$394,302
EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$127,206
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$70,536
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$6,129
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $772k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 5%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $250k → 17%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $127k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CHARLOTTE METRO CHAPTER: $18k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $71k → 17%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $300k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $8.6M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$6.8M · 79% · 5860 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Central America and the Caribbean$872k · 10% · 971 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

South America$222k · 3% · 184 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$214k · 2% · 64 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

North America (Canada and Mexico)$199k · 2% · 119 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

South Asia$173k · 2% · 94 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Middle East and North Africa$159k · 2% · 53 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Sub-Saharan Africa$5k · 0% · 3 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Russia and Neighboring States$500 · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 5 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$11M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+31%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $522k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $11M · revenue +80%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2023–2025 · $89k · revenue +22%
  • AC
    AMERICA'S CHARITIES
    2× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • ACHIEVING THE DREAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3.5M · revenue -2%
  • NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3.0M · revenue -76%
  • CC
    CINTAS CARES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1.7M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
6
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America's Charities; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
15/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $10,554,647 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INCACHIEVING THE DREAM INC: $3,500,000 · EducationACHIEVING THE DREAM INCNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC: $2,981,609 · HealthNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLO…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $749,177 · HealthChildren's Hospital Lo…ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $500,000 · HealthELUNA FORMERLY THE MOY…MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $467,475 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH …NAMI National: $350,000 · HealthNAMI NationalDR LORNA BREEN HEROES' FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $500,000 · OtherMASS GENER…THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $500,000 · OtherTHE MENTAL…MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $500,000 · OtherMENTAL HEA…CHARLOTTE GOOD NEIGHBOR FUND: $419,743 · OtherCHARLOTTE …THE DOUGY CENTER INC: $350,000 · OtherTHE DOUGY …WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $125,976 · Other+1 more: $80,443 · OtherCINTAS CARES FOUNDATION: $1,675,600 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $75,713 · Philanthropy+1 more: $6,129 · PhilanthropyTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $495,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDARDEN DIMES INC: $394,302 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEF: $250,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $127,206 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $88,902 · Human Services+1 more: $6,331 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $500,000 · Community ImprovementFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $250,000 · Community ImprovementInternational Rescue Committee INC: $275,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact: $64,698 · International
Education$14,054,647Health$5,298,261Other$2,476,162Philanthropy$2,007,442Public Safety & Disaster$914,302Human Services$772,439Community Improvement$750,000International$339,698

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $10,554,647 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetACHIEVING THE DREAM INC: $3,500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC: $2,981,609 over 1y, 17% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $749,177 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $500,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $500,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $495,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $467,475 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHARLOTTE GOOD NEIGHBOR FUND: $419,743 over 2y, 57% of budgetDARDEN DIMES INC: $394,302 over 1y, 12% of budgetNAMI National: $350,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC: $350,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $300,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $275,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC: $250,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEF: $250,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDR LORNA BREEN HEROES' FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $127,206 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $125,976 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $88,902 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $80,443 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $75,713 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $64,698 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE TO TURKIYE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC: $6,331 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E4e Relief LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E4e Relief LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Dougy Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E4e Relief LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home