Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

E4e Relief LLC

We empower companies and individuals to respond to crises by providing a global, charitable solution in times of need.

$40M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$14MHealth$7.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.2MHuman Services$1.0MInternational$365kPhilanthropy$332kArts & Culture$250kFood & Nutrition$126k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $5,256,577 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $40,297,898 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,041,321 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $198k
  • $250k+2 grants · $5.1M
$127,206
Median grant
4
States reached
$95M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA$4,658,404
DARDEN DIMES$394,302
EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$127,206
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$70,536
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$6,129
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $772k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 5%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $250k → 17%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $127k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS CHARLOTTE METRO CHAPTER: $18k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $71k → 17%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $300k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $8.6M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$6.8M · 79% · 5860 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Central America and the Caribbean$872k · 10% · 971 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

South America$222k · 3% · 184 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$214k · 2% · 64 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

North America (Canada and Mexico)$199k · 2% · 119 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

South Asia$173k · 2% · 94 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Middle East and North Africa$159k · 2% · 53 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Sub-Saharan Africa$5k · 0% · 3 people

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

Russia and Neighboring States$500 · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: DISASTER OR HARDSHIP EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 5 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$11M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $522k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $11M · revenue +47%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2023–2025 · $89k · revenue +22%
  • AC
    AMERICA'S CHARITIES
    2× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • ACHIEVING THE DREAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3.5M · revenue -2%
  • NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3.0M · revenue -76%
  • CC
    CINTAS CARES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1.7M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

9
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
10
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America's Charities and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Military Veterans SupportChristian Youth CampsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%50%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
14/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $10,554,647 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INCACHIEVING THE DREAM INC — $3,500,000 · EducationACHIEVING THE DREAM INCNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC — $2,981,609 · HealthNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLO…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $749,177 · HealthChildren's Hospital Lo…ELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $500,000 · HealthELUNA FORMERLY THE MOY…MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $467,475 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH …NAMI National — $350,000 · HealthNAMI NationalDR LORNA BREEN HEROES' FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $500,000 · OtherMASS GENER…MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $500,000 · OtherMENTAL HEA…THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $500,000 · OtherTHE MENTAL…CHARLOTTE GOOD NEIGHBOR FUND — $419,743 · OtherCHARLOTTE …THE DOUGY CENTER INC — $350,000 · OtherTHE DOUGY …WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $125,976 · Other+1 more — $80,443 · OtherCINTAS CARES FOUNDATION — $1,675,600 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $75,713 · Philanthropy+1 more — $6,129 · PhilanthropyTUESDAY'S CHILDREN — $495,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDARDEN DIMES INC — $394,302 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more — $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEF — $250,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $127,206 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $88,902 · Human Services+1 more — $6,331 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $500,000 · Community ImprovementFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC — $250,000 · Community ImprovementInternational Rescue Committee INC — $275,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact — $64,698 · International
Education$14,054,647Health$5,298,261Other$2,476,162Philanthropy$2,007,442Public Safety & Disaster$914,302Human Services$772,439Community Improvement$750,000International$339,698

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $10,554,647 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetACHIEVING THE DREAM INC — $3,500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC — $2,981,609 over 1y, 17% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $749,177 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC — $500,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $500,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTUESDAY'S CHILDREN — $495,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $467,475 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHARLOTTE GOOD NEIGHBOR FUND — $419,743 over 2y, 57% of budgetDARDEN DIMES INC — $394,302 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC — $350,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNAMI National — $350,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $300,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $275,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISCAL SPONSORSHIP ALLIES INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CHILDRENS GRIEF — $250,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDR LORNA BREEN HEROES' FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $127,206 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK — $125,976 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $88,902 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $80,443 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $75,713 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact — $64,698 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE TO TURKIYE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSRS RAISE THE ROOF FOUNDATION INC — $6,331 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization E4e Relief LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Dougy Center Inc1% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph