Skip to content

· Private foundation

E L Spencer Jr Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$489kEducation$216kHealth$164kPhilanthropy$156kFood & Nutrition$70kHuman Services$44kCrime & Legal$17kAnimals$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAMC FOUNDATION$50,000
CHRIST CITY CHURCH$20,000
MERCY MEDICAL MINISTRY & CLINIC$18,000
LAKEVIEW BAPTIST CHURCH$18,000
UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC$14,000
AUBURN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,000
FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
EXODUS RANCH$2,500
ALABAMA SHERIFF'S GIRL'S RANCH$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,200
THE WAY 2 SERVE$2,000
CARE HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $6k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $5k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $3k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $3k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $3k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $2k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $1k → 10%THE WAY 2 SERVE: $2k → 15%MISION VIDA NUEVA: $1k → 15%EAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY: $5k → 15%ESPERANZA HOUSE: $1k → 15%EAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY: $1k → 15%EAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
CA
CO
NM
TN
NC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 25 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+27%

Still filing today

48%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterReligionAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +51%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +2%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • EA
    EAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +328%
  • LB
    LAKEVIEW BAPTIST CHURCH YOUTH CAMP
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
2
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
3
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
4
Woman's Missionary Union Foundation

The woman's missionary union foundation was organized for the purpose of motivating and facilitating the making of gifts, donations, and benefactions for the advancement, promotion and maintenance of woman's missionary union and the…

Human Services
5
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
6
United Way of West Alabama Inc

The mission of united way of west alabama is to promote the general welfare of the citizens of west alabama by: raising funds, on an annual basis, to assist the effective delivery of health and human care programs and services, allocating…

Philanthropy
7
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
8
University of North Alabama Foundation

To support the university of north alabama in its educational endeavors.

Education
9
Agape of Central Alabama Inc

As a ministry of jesus christ, agape's mission is that vulnerable and orphaned children find permanency in safe, nurturing families.

Human Services
10
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
11
United Way of Northwest Alabama

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community

Philanthropy
12
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Alabama Services for the Elderly; the most unlike its peers is The Exodus Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $442,260 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC: $126,033 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INCEAMC FOUNDATION: $112,700 · OtherEAMC FOUNDATIONFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $69,300 · OtherFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INCMERCY MEDICAL MINISTRY & CLINIC: $45,100 · Other+38 more: $135,925 · Other+38 moreAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $180,100 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Education+2 more: $2,700 · EducationPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $22,000 · Human ServicesEAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY: $7,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE WAY 2 SERVE INC F/K/A THE WAY MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMision Vida Nueva: $1,200 · Human Services+1 more: $1,080 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC: $9,300 · Housing & ShelterThe Exodus Ranch: $8,500 · Housing & ShelterCARE HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,600 · Animals
Other$931,318Education$189,800Human Services$35,280Philanthropy$30,000International$25,000Housing & Shelter$17,800Animals$10,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $180,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC: $126,033 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $69,300 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $30,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCARE HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC: $9,300 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetThe Exodus Ranch: $8,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY: $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MONTEVALLO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WAY 2 SERVE INC F/K/A THE WAY MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetShepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMision Vida Nueva: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaura Crandall Brown Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CARE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Exodus Ranch ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST ALABAMA SERVICES FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds EAST ALABAMA MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MONTEVALLO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WAY 2 SERVE INC F/K/A THE WAY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Shepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mision Vida Nueva ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL20.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Comitas Foundation Inc · Samford-Cannon Foundation · Scott Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization E L Spencer Jr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from E L Spencer Jr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E L Spencer Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph