Skip to content

Maryland · Private foundation

E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$212k
Granted FY2021
32
Grants FY2021
29
Organizations funded FY2021
3%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 25 organizations, $212k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
’17
24
’18
24
’19
25
’20
25
’21
0
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$16,000
Organizations funded a year
29 to 30
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
10
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 3% of the organizations E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202129$197k3%
FY202030$149k7%
FY201930$148k23%
FY201830$146k3%
FY201730$130kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$918kHealth$203kEnvironment$173kArts & Culture$114kCivil Rights$87kHuman Services$47kEducation$46kFood & Nutrition$44kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
MD
NM
DC
AL
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 30 grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($136k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $51,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Club Foundation: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA Wider Circle Inc: $46,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: $43,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetManna Food Center Inc: $42,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Social Service Agency: $39,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Archaeological Conservancy: $33,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $32,986 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Reach Institute Resource for Advancing Children's Health: $32,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Federation of America Inc: $28,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Resources Defense Council Inc: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Poverty Law Center Inc: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChadd Inc Children and Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: $26,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetC&O Canal Trust Inc: $20,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGreater Washington Educational Telecommunications Association Inc: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $14,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSome Inc: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington DC Inc: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Strathmore Hall Foundation Inc: $11,380 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potomac Conservancy Inc: $10,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGreater Washington Jewish Coalition Contd: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBaltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSibley Memorial Hospital Foundation: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBiblical Archaeology Society: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHias Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Abraham Initiatives Inc: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational Council of Jewish Women Incorporated: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSuburban Hospital Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCapital Area Food Bank Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 30.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International FoundationNY12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation with peer funders

About E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation

How much does E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation give?
E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation reported 32 grants totaling $212,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 29 and 30 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2021, its largest causes are Philanthropy (54%), Health (12%), Environment (10%).
Who are E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2021: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc ($52k), Sierra Club Foundation ($46k), A Wider Circle Inc ($46k).
Does E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 3% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Ibm International Foundation, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation based?
E Bryce & Harriet Alpern Foundation is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E Bryce & Harriet Alpern’s filings →

More from the funding graph