Skip to content
Durant Family Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Durant Family Charitable Foundation

To enrich the lives of at-risk youth from ages 6 to 18 through eductional, atheltic and social program support.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$6.3MYouth Development$2.1MInternational$211kHuman Services$195kEnvironment$130kHousing & Shelter$103kPhilanthropy$90kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$75,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$647k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE TRACK$1,000,000
Bowie State University$250,000
14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC$75,000
Design FC$15,000
The BrotherhoodSisterSol Inc$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $184k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $10k → 8%THOMPSON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%LIFESTYLES OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $33k → 8%Mamba & Mambacita Sports Foundation: $50k → 10%LIFESTYLES OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $24k → 8%WANDA DURANT THE REAL MVP CHARITY INC: $25k → 11%Fight For Children Inc: $25k → 14%Covenant House New York: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 15 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
39

Total granted

$5.6M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

80%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COLLEGE TRACK
    4× · 2018–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +18%
  • THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $148k · revenue +34%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    2× · 2022–2023 · $130k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • LS
    LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +36%
  • CT
    COLLEGE TRACK
    one grant, 2021 · $750k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2021 · $600k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
2
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
3
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
4
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
7
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
8
Brooklyn Community Foundation

Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.

Philanthropy
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
11
The Giving Back Fund

To improve lives by expanding the number of people and the amount of resources dedicated to giving.

Philanthropy
12
Philadelphia Youth Basketball Inc

Philadelphia youth basketball (pyb) is a community-built youth empowerment organization that leverages the iconic game of basketball to help today's urban youth overcome the most urgent and systemic issues facing underserved…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mayor's Fund to Advance New York City; the most unlike its peers is Yula High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
25/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $1,800,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASCOLLEGE TRACK: $750,000 · OtherCOLLEGE TRACKTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $600,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXASTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $600,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK+25 more: $582,690 · Other+25 moreCOLLEGE TRACK: $2,523,380 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK+2 more: $12,500 · EducationLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA: $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsLAUREUS SPORT…PHILADELPHIA UNION FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsPHILADELPHIA …+2 more: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $148,109 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $74,474 · Youth DevelopmentNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $40,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $5,151 · Youth Development14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $35,750 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $25,589 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,630 · InternationalLIFESTYLES OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $56,145 · Human ServicesMAMBA & MAMBACITA SPORTS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesFIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesWANDA DURRANT THE REAL MVP FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $15,789 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesSilicon Valley De-Bug: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHOMPSON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $130,000 · Environment
Other$4,832,690Education$2,535,880Recreation & Sports$1,110,000Youth Development$367,734International$201,969Human Services$199,434Environment$130,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $2,523,380 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetLAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USA: $1,000,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $148,109 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA UNION FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $74,474 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $57,532 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFESTYLES OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $56,145 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMAMBA & MAMBACITA SPORTS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW HEIGHTS YOUTH INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $35,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEastern Mennonite University: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESIGN FC INC: $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $25,589 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITCCH IN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $15,789 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,630 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBABY2BABY: $11,720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley De-Bug: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMPSON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYULA HIGH SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Community Foundation of South Puget Sound: $5,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLLECTIVE IDENTITY MENTORING: $5,151 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetTHE BUDDY HIELD FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHEARTLAND HOOPS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Basketball P…Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Verizon FoundationNational Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
National Basketball Players Association FoundationNY15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Basketball Players Association Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Durant Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Durant Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Lifestyles of Maryland Foundation Inc: 42% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Durant Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Durant Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Durant Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home